1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990212)82:4<312::aid-ajmg7>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrachromosomal triplication of 2q11.2-q21 in a severely malformed infant: Case report and review of triplications and their possible mechanism

Abstract: A female fetus with brain malformations, multicystic kidneys, absence of the right thumb, and a posterior cleft of palate was delivered at 32 weeks of gestation. Cytogenetic studies including FISH showed a novel intrachromosomal triplication of the proximal long arm of chromosome 2 (q11.2-q21), resulting in tetrasomy for this segment. The middle repeat was inverted. At least 11 patients with intrachromosomal triplications have been reported, mostly involving chromosome 15q. The mechanism involved in formation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the orofacial clefting could be caused by a null mutation through disruption of a single dominant gene mapping at or near 2q13, as previously suggested by Riegel and Schinzel [2002]. Another patient with CPO and a triplication of 2q demonstrated different breakpoints [Wang et al, 1999], however, the triplication was only studied using G-banding and chromosome painting, and therefore, the location of the chromosomal breakpoints could be imprecise in that particular case. However, apart from the possibility of a disruption of a hypothetical single dominant gene for orofacial clefting (cleft lip/palate, CPO, and Pierre Robin sequence), a long distance effect of the duplication on such a dominant gene, or possible discussions on imprecise breakpoint determinations in chromosomal triplications not studied using FISH and locus specific DNA probes [Õ unap et al, 2005], another mechanism could apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the orofacial clefting could be caused by a null mutation through disruption of a single dominant gene mapping at or near 2q13, as previously suggested by Riegel and Schinzel [2002]. Another patient with CPO and a triplication of 2q demonstrated different breakpoints [Wang et al, 1999], however, the triplication was only studied using G-banding and chromosome painting, and therefore, the location of the chromosomal breakpoints could be imprecise in that particular case. However, apart from the possibility of a disruption of a hypothetical single dominant gene for orofacial clefting (cleft lip/palate, CPO, and Pierre Robin sequence), a long distance effect of the duplication on such a dominant gene, or possible discussions on imprecise breakpoint determinations in chromosomal triplications not studied using FISH and locus specific DNA probes [Õ unap et al, 2005], another mechanism could apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cytogenetic and FISH analysis showed a duplication of 2q13-q22. There have been only nine previous reports on a total of 10 patients with a pure duplication or triplication of the proximal chromosome 2q [Wang and Hunter, 1979;Mu et al, 1984;Lanman et al, 1986;Grevengood et al, 1993;Cooke et al, 1995;Glass et al, 1998;Wang et al, 1999;Riegel and Schinzel, 2002;Wegner et al, 2004]. Due to the variable clinical features and chromosomal breakpoints, no common pattern of a proximal duplication 2q syndrome could be defined from these cases, not even from the patients in whom breakpoints presumably were very similar [Riegel and Schinzel, 2002].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations