2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracellular targeting delivery of liposomal drugs to solid tumors based on EPR effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
292
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
292
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To exploit the singularities of the tumor vasculature, nanocarriers must have enough circulation half-life to passively target the tumor environment, avoiding the action of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) and the reticulo-endothelial system (RES) during their transportation throughout the bloodstream, and releasing the anticancer drugs in tumor [63][64][65]. For this purpose, nanocarrier size must not exceed 400 nm to escape from the MPS and achieve the extravasation into tumors by the EPR effect, which is much more effective with diameters below 200 nm [66][67][68]. In addition, the surface of these nano-scale carriers must be hydrophilic and neutral or slightly anionic to avoid the plasma proteins (opsonins) and to delay the macrophage attack [69].…”
Section: Clinical Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exploit the singularities of the tumor vasculature, nanocarriers must have enough circulation half-life to passively target the tumor environment, avoiding the action of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) and the reticulo-endothelial system (RES) during their transportation throughout the bloodstream, and releasing the anticancer drugs in tumor [63][64][65]. For this purpose, nanocarrier size must not exceed 400 nm to escape from the MPS and achieve the extravasation into tumors by the EPR effect, which is much more effective with diameters below 200 nm [66][67][68]. In addition, the surface of these nano-scale carriers must be hydrophilic and neutral or slightly anionic to avoid the plasma proteins (opsonins) and to delay the macrophage attack [69].…”
Section: Clinical Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This modification is especially effective in passively targeting malignant tissue, with increased liposomal uptake through leaky tumor microvasculature and prolonged retention time due to reduced lymphatic drainage occurring via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. 14,15 We have previously demonstrated that peripheral administration of PEGylated nanoparticles containing anticancer Survivin siRNA leads to a significant reduction in tumor growth in a murine xenograft model of breast cancer. 16 In addition, we have formulated lipid-encapsulated acetate (LITA) nanoparticles which, following peripheral delivery in obese mice, resulted in improvements in a wide range of metabolic outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles carrying drugs can increase this therapeutic ratio over that achieved with the free drug through several mechanisms. In particular, drugs delivered by nanoparticles are thought to selectively enhance the concentration of the drugs in tumors as a result of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). The enhanced permeability results from a leaky tumor vascular system, whereas the enhanced retention results from the disorganized lymphatic system that is characteristic of malignant tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%