“…In particular, the imidazo [1,2-a] pyridine amides (IPAs) class is surprisingly highly selective to mycobacteria [ 48 , 50 ], and the most advanced derivatives showed MICs in the nanomolar range. The discovery of Q203 (Telacebec, Figure 8 ) [ 51 ], the most advanced compound of this class, has prompted many to lead optimization programs around the IPA scaffold providing elaborated SARs: - 6- or 7-Cl groups at the R 2 position enhance both the activity and the metabolic stability with respect to the unsubstituted compounds [ 52 , 53 , 54 ];
- the ethyl group at R 1 appears to be the most favorable [ 52 , 53 , 54 ];
- a lipophilic side chain is pivotal for the activity, regardless of chain length and linearity [ 52 ];
- the substituted N -benzyl group at the side chain is important but not critical for the activity [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ];
- 4-trifluoromethoxy-phenyl-piperidino group is the best one at the side chain, but can be replaced by other nitrogen heterocycles to improve PK properties [ 55 , 58 ];
- generally, scaffold switching is not a good option since that of the imidazo [1,2-a] pyridine-3-carboxamides is optimal for potency and ADME properties [ 59 ], but there are a few exceptions [ 60 , 61 , 62 ];
- the presence of -NH in the carboxamide group at 3 is critical for the activity, as well as the carbonyl group [ 53 , 54 ];
- switching the position of the carboxamide from 3 to 2 results in less effective derivatives.
…”