2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70143-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracavernosal Injection and Intraurethral Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Padma-Nathan and colleagues 59 reported a response rate of 65.9%. Fulgham and associates 60 noted improvement in 30% of patients; however, this study has been criticized for inadequate dose titration. 61 The most common side effect of intraurethral alprostadil therapy is local penile pain caused by drug-mediated sensitization of nerve fibres.…”
Section: Alternative Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Padma-Nathan and colleagues 59 reported a response rate of 65.9%. Fulgham and associates 60 noted improvement in 30% of patients; however, this study has been criticized for inadequate dose titration. 61 The most common side effect of intraurethral alprostadil therapy is local penile pain caused by drug-mediated sensitization of nerve fibres.…”
Section: Alternative Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…61 The most common side effect of intraurethral alprostadil therapy is local penile pain caused by drug-mediated sensitization of nerve fibres. 60 Vasoactive drugs may also be injected intracavernosally. Such therapy represents an important second-line therapy for erectile dysfunction.…”
Section: Alternative Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 It is thought to be of most benefit in men whose ED has a neurogenic aetiology. Some men are unable to tolerate penile injections and compliance can be a problem if adequate support is not made available, with 50 per cent stopping after the first two to three months.…”
Section: Intracavernous Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approved second-line therapies include vacuum-constriction devices, 2 along with intracavernous and intraurethral administration of alprostadil. 3,4 Transcutaneous medications 5 and new oral medications [6][7][8] are under active investigation. Arterial 9,10 and/or venous 11,12 procedures are available for highly selected individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%