\s=b\Over a 22-month period, we investigated optic and otic toxicity accompanying i ntra\x=req-\ arterial cisplatin therapy. Baseline and serial neurologic and ophthalmologic examinations, visual evoked potentials, and brain\x=req-\ stem auditory evoked potentials were performed in six patients, aged 37 to 53 years. Patients received infraophthalmic intra-arterial cisplatin (60 mg/m2) every month for three to 10 treatments (mean, six treatments). Five of the six patients had progressive optic toxicity. In two patients, the visual evoked potential prolongation preceded acuity loss by at least 4 months. Two patients had evidence of otic toxicity by either brain\x=req-\ stem auditory evoked potential or click threshold and brain-stem auditory evoked potential. Intra-arterial cisplatin neurotoxicity may be significant in patients with already limited survival. Visual evoked potential and brain-stem auditory evoked potential should be used to monitor patients receiving potentially neurotoxic therapy.{Arch Neurol. 1992;49:83-86)f~~* isplatin (ris-dichlorodiammine platinum [III) is used to treat both sys¬ temic and central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. It has a significant role in the treatment of testicular, ovar¬ ian, adrenal, lung, and bone tumors.1 Cisplatin is also employed as an agent against neoplasms of the CNS. Some investigators have shown intra-arterial therapy to be efficacious in the treat¬ ment of malignant cerebral tumors.2The administration of cisplatin is lim¬ ited by its toxic effects. Nephrotoxicity,35 nausea, vomiting,11''7 myelosuppression,8,9 and peripheral neuropathy1""'2 occur frequently. Less commonly, systemic administration of cisplatin results in neurosensory hear¬ ing loss,13"1" optic neuritis,16 optic disc edema, ' ' cortical blindness,1S altered col¬ or vision,19 papilledema,16 encephalopa¬ thy,2921 and seizures. 22'23