2015
DOI: 10.1177/0956797615586979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- Versus Intersex Aggression

Abstract: Two theories offer competing explanations of sex differences in aggressive behavior: sexual-selection theory and social-role theory. While each theory has specific strengths and limitations depending on the victim's sex, research hardly differentiates between intrasex and intersex aggression. In the present study, 11,307 students (mean age = 14.96 years; 50% girls, 50% boys) from 597 school classes provided social-network data (aggression and friendship networks) as well as physical (body mass index) and psych… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we believe that it is less helpful to prioritize one theory than it is to consider both equally in one’s conceptual reasoning and analytic models. This is what we did in our original article (Wölfer & Hewstone, 2015), and this is in line with recent integrative approaches that consider both sides of the nature-nurture debate underlying this theoretical competition (Eagly & Wood, 2013; Geary, 1999; van den Berghe, 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In fact, we believe that it is less helpful to prioritize one theory than it is to consider both equally in one’s conceptual reasoning and analytic models. This is what we did in our original article (Wölfer & Hewstone, 2015), and this is in line with recent integrative approaches that consider both sides of the nature-nurture debate underlying this theoretical competition (Eagly & Wood, 2013; Geary, 1999; van den Berghe, 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Risk sensitivity is a trait that differs between men and women (Cross et al, 2011) and one that directly affects aggression levels (Campbell, 2013;2015;Eagly & Steffen, 1986). Furthermore, the perceived risk associated with aggressive acts depends on social context (sex of target) and cultural prescriptions (differential permissibility of aggression as a function of perpetrator's and target's sex).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%