2004
DOI: 10.1080/0267303032000168630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra‐Urban migration and housing submarkets: theory and evidence

Abstract: In the 1950s and 1960s a group of housing economists at ColumbiaUniversity developed a framework for the analyses of urban housing markets which was based around the concept of housing submarkets and household migration. There is now widespread agreement amongst housing economists that submarkets should be adopted as a working hypothesis but the concept has been reformulated in terms of intra-urban relative house price differentials. The accepted test for submarket existence uses a hedonic model of house price… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a body of literature in which the spatial component of submarkets are thought to be important, but are assumed to conform with existing administrative boundaries such as suburbs, postcodes districts, local government jurisdictions, electoral boundaries and other forms of a priori definitions proposed by real estate agents and other land professionals (Adair et al, 1996;Bourassa et al, 2002;Jones et al, 2004). In studies based on a priori definitions, separate submarket status is based on the now accepted test for submarket difference laid down by Schnare and Struyk (1976) as generating significantly different hedonic house price models based on structural property attribute data.…”
Section: Current Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a body of literature in which the spatial component of submarkets are thought to be important, but are assumed to conform with existing administrative boundaries such as suburbs, postcodes districts, local government jurisdictions, electoral boundaries and other forms of a priori definitions proposed by real estate agents and other land professionals (Adair et al, 1996;Bourassa et al, 2002;Jones et al, 2004). In studies based on a priori definitions, separate submarket status is based on the now accepted test for submarket difference laid down by Schnare and Struyk (1976) as generating significantly different hedonic house price models based on structural property attribute data.…”
Section: Current Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones et al (2004) and Clayton (1996) focus on markets within a city. Jones et al (2004) investigates the role of submarkets in analyzing intra-city housing market dynamics in Glasgow, UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity measures the extent to which local markets exhibit structural variations, because of different household characteristics in each location or property types. This provides one approach to the measurement of housing market areas (Jones et al, 2004;Leishman, 2009;Maclennan and Tu, 1996). The use of regional or other administrative area data sets that do not correspond to local housing market areas will often introduce spatially correlated errors.…”
Section: Spatial Econometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%