2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-tooth study of modern rhinoceros enamel δ18O: Is the difference between phosphate and carbonate δ18O a sound diagenetic test?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 O C-P $ 9‰ (Martin et al, 2008), is consistent with the 8.5‰ fractionation factor calculated here at 37°C between carbonate and phosphate in carbonated fluorapatite. The carbonate-phosphate relationship displays a natural variability (e.g.…”
Section: Hydroxyapatite Oxygen Internal Fractionationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…18 O C-P $ 9‰ (Martin et al, 2008), is consistent with the 8.5‰ fractionation factor calculated here at 37°C between carbonate and phosphate in carbonated fluorapatite. The carbonate-phosphate relationship displays a natural variability (e.g.…”
Section: Hydroxyapatite Oxygen Internal Fractionationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is important to identify these samples as such interaction may cause large changes to the primary isotope life signal. [31] Potential diagenetic alteration in tooth and bone are often identified by crystallinity index, [23,51,52] %C yields [53] [1,5,25] We know from studies of strontium isotopes that less resistant material such as bone and dentine frequently react in the burial environment and equilibration and deposition will affect the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr of these materials. [43,50] To test the reliability of the structural carbonate component we undertook analysis of six teeth, where it was clear from existing strontium isotope analysis that the integrity of the enamel had been compromised.…”
Section: An Assessment Of Diagenetic Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O C values (slope, intercept and Δ C-P ) is species-specific, where Δ C-P is the difference between d [25] demonstrated that there are statistical differences between the intercepts of the d…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iacumin et al (1996) found α=1.0090±0.0007 (n=31), Bryant et al (1996) found α=1.0086±0.0007 (n=42), and Martin et al (2008) found α=1.0082±0.0007 (22 measurements on two teeth); other, smaller, studies are summarised in Martin et al (2008). Since the studies by Iacumin et al (1996) and Bryant et al (1996) have the largest number of data points, they are probably the most reliable.…”
Section: Re-interpreting the Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consequently, when δ 18 O bw is expressed as a linear function of δ 18 O dw , the gradient of the relationship is less than one (Luz et al, 1984). Enamel carbonate and phosphate are in isotopic equilibrium with body water at 37 ºC at the time of formation but, as Bell et al (2009: 168) rightly point out, the chemical routes differ, so that the values are offset (Iacumin et al, 1996;Bryant et al, 1996;Martin et al, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%