2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00803-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-subject approach for gait-event prediction by neural network interpretation of EMG signals

Abstract: Background Gait analysis is acknowledged as the main approach for quantitatively assessing the alteration of motor function in different contexts, such as in basic research and clinics. Technological development is making available smart and wearable sensors (inertial Abstract Background: Machine learning models were satisfactorily implemented for estimating gait events from surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals during walking. Most of them are based on inter-subject approaches for data preparation. Aim of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mean F1-score of 99.0% and a MAE of 21.6 ms were detected for the prediction of HS events and a mean F1-score of 98.4% and a MAE of 38.1 ms were identified for the prediction of TO events [18]. This approach has been numerically outperformed by a subsequent study of the same group of researchers based on intra-subjects experiments in the same population [19]. Average classification accuracy of 96.1±1.9% and mean MAE of 14.4±4.7 ms (associated to an F1-score of 99.3%) and 23.7±11.3 ms (associated to an F1-score of 98.5%) in predicting HS and TO timing were provided.…”
Section: ) Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A mean F1-score of 99.0% and a MAE of 21.6 ms were detected for the prediction of HS events and a mean F1-score of 98.4% and a MAE of 38.1 ms were identified for the prediction of TO events [18]. This approach has been numerically outperformed by a subsequent study of the same group of researchers based on intra-subjects experiments in the same population [19]. Average classification accuracy of 96.1±1.9% and mean MAE of 14.4±4.7 ms (associated to an F1-score of 99.3%) and 23.7±11.3 ms (associated to an F1-score of 98.5%) in predicting HS and TO timing were provided.…”
Section: ) Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The neural network used in this work is a simple single-layer network with 10 units and the Levenberg Marquardt algorithm was used to train the network. These methods are based on hand-crafted features; otherwise, previous studies by authors of the present paper adopted a featureless approach, employing Multi-Layer Perceptrons to process the envelope of sEMG signals [18,19]. One further difference is the optimization algorithm: Levenberg Marquardt in [17], Adam in [18,19].…”
Section: ) Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations