2021
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics6040063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Subject and Inter-Subject Movement Variability Quantified with Muscle Synergies in Upper-Limb Reaching Movements

Abstract: Quantifying movement variability is a crucial aspect for clinical and laboratory investigations in several contexts. However, very few studies have assessed, in detail, the intra-subject variability across movements and the inter-subject variability. Muscle synergies are a valuable method that can be used to assess such variability. In this study, we assess, in detail, intra-subject and inter-subject variability in a scenario based on a comprehensive dataset, including multiple repetitions of multi-directional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
25
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the similarity between participants, our findings presented the median values of similarity ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 for five trunk muscle synergies (W) and from 0.64 to 0.75 for their temporal patterns (C). These inter-cluster similarities appear to be greater than those in highly variable upper-limb movements found in a previous study, although the similarity of temporal patterns was not assessed 22 , 55 . This suggests that trunk muscle synergies have more robust features as the trunk requires both stability and movement even in the loosely constrained task scenario, compared with the upper limbs, which primarily function as a wide range of manipulations with many degrees of freedom and involve motor cortical neurons with complex and heterogeneous motor patterns 39 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Regarding the similarity between participants, our findings presented the median values of similarity ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 for five trunk muscle synergies (W) and from 0.64 to 0.75 for their temporal patterns (C). These inter-cluster similarities appear to be greater than those in highly variable upper-limb movements found in a previous study, although the similarity of temporal patterns was not assessed 22 , 55 . This suggests that trunk muscle synergies have more robust features as the trunk requires both stability and movement even in the loosely constrained task scenario, compared with the upper limbs, which primarily function as a wide range of manipulations with many degrees of freedom and involve motor cortical neurons with complex and heterogeneous motor patterns 39 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Regarding the similarity between participants, our ndings presented the median values of similarity ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 for ve trunk muscle synergies (W) and from 0.64 to 0.75 for their temporal patterns (C). These inter-cluster similarities appear to be greater than those in highly variable upper-limb movements found in a previous study, although the similarity of temporal patterns was not assessed 20,50 . This suggests that trunk muscle synergies have more robust features as the trunk requires both stability and movement even in the loosely constrained task scenario, compared with the upper limbs, which primarily function as a wide range of manipulations with many degrees of freedom and involve motor cortical neurons with complex and heterogeneous motor patterns 33 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Furthermore, some level of variability between sessions can also be attributed to experimental protocols, including the fact that electrodes were not placed on each trunk muscle in exactly the same way between sessions, or other physical factors, such as skin conditions and fatigue 17,56 . Thus, variability due to experimental factors needs to be considered when evaluating motor control strategies in different populations in longitudinal studies with multiple sessions 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the limitations of superficial electromyography (e.g., lack of access to deep muscles), we have developed an 18-muscle 3-D model of the human lumbar spine to estimate muscular activity. Furthermore, it has been reported that separation of muscle activation into a tonic component (responsible for producing anti-gravitational joint torque for maintaining postural stability) and a phasic component (responsible for producing dynamic joint torque by including the effect of velocity and acceleration/deceleration of movement) allows for better evaluation of muscle activation and subsequently muscular synergies (7, 20, 21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%