2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-specific leaf trait responses to species richness at two different local scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reveals that species richness selects for communities with higher resource acquisition rate and more diverse resource acquisition strategy (Wright et al, 2004 ). These responses were observed in diversity experiments in grassland and forest ecosystems (Davrinche & Haider, 2021 ; Siebenkäs et al, 2017 ) and was interpreted as a limiting similarity process enhancing complementarity in light and nutrient resources (Gubsch et al, 2011 ; McKane et al, 2002 ). On the opposite, in communities that were less diverse, dominant individuals converge toward graminoid‐like species with high nutrient conservation (e.g., Typha in nutrient‐rich ecosystem, Eriophorum and Carex in nutrient‐poor ecosystem).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This reveals that species richness selects for communities with higher resource acquisition rate and more diverse resource acquisition strategy (Wright et al, 2004 ). These responses were observed in diversity experiments in grassland and forest ecosystems (Davrinche & Haider, 2021 ; Siebenkäs et al, 2017 ) and was interpreted as a limiting similarity process enhancing complementarity in light and nutrient resources (Gubsch et al, 2011 ; McKane et al, 2002 ). On the opposite, in communities that were less diverse, dominant individuals converge toward graminoid‐like species with high nutrient conservation (e.g., Typha in nutrient‐rich ecosystem, Eriophorum and Carex in nutrient‐poor ecosystem).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For each tree species of the experiment, 10 samples consisting of 10–25 pooled fresh leaves were collected across all diversity levels from mid‐August to October 2018 (Davrinche & Haider, 2021). Each sample was dried at 80°C for 2 days and milled for 5 min at 26 shakes per second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The replicate numbers vary to some extent, besides tree species and richness level corrections, due to self-thinning making some trees very rare in certain richness levels. Moreover, we followed a sampling scheme that matches the sampling of leaf traits [55], which increases the intended tree replicate numbers per tree richness level from 5 to 6 in monocultures and to 9 in 2-species mixtures. Effects of differences in tree replicate numbers were accounted for in the analyses by using replicate numbers as a covariate in caterpillar richness analyses (see Section 2.5.1).…”
Section: Study Region and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), nitrogen (N), carbon (C), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), and phosphorus (P) were measured on all trees used in the study (details on leaf trait measurements are provided in Supplement S1; see also [55,63]). The selection of leaf traits from candidates for analysis was based on internal collinearities (Pearson r < 7; see Figure S1 for trait correlations).…”
Section: Leaf Trait Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation