2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-rater repeatability of the Oxford foot model in healthy children in different stages of the foot roll over process during gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
56
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During walking skin movement and furthermore detachment of the CEPG were recognized. These problems might be related to the high inter-subject variance for the hindfoot-tibia motion mainly in the frontal plane, which was found in this study, and which has also been reported by previous studies [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During walking skin movement and furthermore detachment of the CEPG were recognized. These problems might be related to the high inter-subject variance for the hindfoot-tibia motion mainly in the frontal plane, which was found in this study, and which has also been reported by previous studies [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Verification of clinical diagnosis of foot deformities in the paediatric population during gait with a multi-segment foot model like the OFM is still needed [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is aimed at better transcribing the foot anatomy. The OFM repeatability has been validated for adults and children (Curtis et al, 2009;Stebbins et al, 2006). These multi-segment foot models undoubtedly made a consequent knowledge emerge on internal foot movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus has shifted from equipment accuracy and resolution [1,2] to model repeatability [3][4][5][6], replication [5,7,8], and clinical application [9][10][11][12][13]. While kinematic analysis is now commonplace, the few models that have incorporated kinetics [14,15] have been hampered by excessive assumptions and equipment limitations [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%