2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the rapid entire body assessment (REBA) tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter-rater reliability values (termed the Kappa value) can then be calculated, and this work employed this scrutiny. Several means of calculating Kappa can be employed, depending upon the number of raters involved (Schwartz et al, 2019). Kappa values range between 0 and 1, indicating 'no agreement' or 'complete agreement', respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-rater reliability values (termed the Kappa value) can then be calculated, and this work employed this scrutiny. Several means of calculating Kappa can be employed, depending upon the number of raters involved (Schwartz et al, 2019). Kappa values range between 0 and 1, indicating 'no agreement' or 'complete agreement', respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides comprehensiveness, REBA is highly sensitive especially to analyze the unpredictable postures of people working in the health care and other service sectors. Analysis indicates that the REBA method has a reasonable inter and intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.925) to analyze working postures [12].…”
Section: What This Article Addsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The REBA method has been translated into other languages such as Portuguese [110]. Its reliability was also evaluated in 2019 by Schwartz et al [116]. Moreover, it has been compared to other methods [115], raising the possibility of creating a comprehensive method for all work tasks and all body parts.…”
Section: Activities Of Households As Employers; Undifferentiated Goodmentioning
confidence: 99%