2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-patient alternated dose escalation of paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus paclitaxel followed by fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in fit elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hopefully, the statistically powered (n ϭ 833) phase III trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201) may provide a clear indication for clinical response and a survival advantage, although the interim analyses do not show a clinical benefit. 10 In general, gemcitabine was well tolerated in both arms 12,17,19 ; however, in some studies, increased incidences of hematologic and/or other adverse effects were reported with the FDR arm. 9,13,16,20…”
Section: Is There a Clinical Advantage Of Fdr Gemcitabine?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hopefully, the statistically powered (n ϭ 833) phase III trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201) may provide a clear indication for clinical response and a survival advantage, although the interim analyses do not show a clinical benefit. 10 In general, gemcitabine was well tolerated in both arms 12,17,19 ; however, in some studies, increased incidences of hematologic and/or other adverse effects were reported with the FDR arm. 9,13,16,20…”
Section: Is There a Clinical Advantage Of Fdr Gemcitabine?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…15 Other investigations in the same disease did not show any clinical benefit with FDR gemcitabine in combination with either carboplatin, 18 cisplatin, 16 or paclitaxel. 19 The inconsistency regarding clinical results may result from patient population differences: small numbers, heterogeneous disease, and heavily pretreated patients with extremely low response rate. Hopefully, the statistically powered (n ϭ 833) phase III trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201) may provide a clear indication for clinical response and a survival advantage, although the interim analyses do not show a clinical benefit.…”
Section: Is There a Clinical Advantage Of Fdr Gemcitabine?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paclitaxel has also been studied in combination with nonplatinum agents. Comella and colleagues evaluated paclitaxel and gemcitabine in two randomized phase II studies [50,51]. Doublet treatment comprising paclitaxelgemcitabine or gemcitabine-vinorelbine was associated with a significantly longer OS time compared with pacli-taxel or gemcitabine monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59 -0.99), without an greater toxicity [51].…”
Section: First-line Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The association of gemcitabine and taxanes has been extensively studied in phase II trials with response rates averaging approximately 30%. [41][42][43][44] A pooled analysis of six clinical trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group showed comparable efficacy and toxicity of GD combinations between younger (70 years) and older (70 years) patients. 45 However, a recently published phase III trial of GD vs docetaxel alone in elderly patients and subjects with poor performance status showed no survival improvement for the combination arm, suggesting that single agent chemotherapy should remain the standard of care for these groups of patients.…”
Section: Gemcitabine In Elderly Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%