2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-orbitofrontal cortex injection of haloperidol removes the beneficial effect of methylphenidate on reversal learning of spontaneously hypertensive rats in an attentional set-shifting task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These discrepancies might be explained by the sensitivity of the different behavioral tests and by the use of Wistar rats as controls in the present study while WKY are typically the normotensive-control group for SHR. However, we, and others, observed a reduced level of locomotor activity and investigatory behavior in WKY rats compared to Wistar rats (Hård et al, 1985; Paré, 2000; Li and Huang, 2006; Cheng and Li, 2013), which makes them poor behavioral controls when compared to Wistars (Hernandez et al, 2003; Kantak et al, 2008; Cheng and Li, 2013). Arguably, there is no perfect control for the SHR in terms of behavior and with respect to the brain atrophy that is selectively observed in this strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These discrepancies might be explained by the sensitivity of the different behavioral tests and by the use of Wistar rats as controls in the present study while WKY are typically the normotensive-control group for SHR. However, we, and others, observed a reduced level of locomotor activity and investigatory behavior in WKY rats compared to Wistar rats (Hård et al, 1985; Paré, 2000; Li and Huang, 2006; Cheng and Li, 2013), which makes them poor behavioral controls when compared to Wistars (Hernandez et al, 2003; Kantak et al, 2008; Cheng and Li, 2013). Arguably, there is no perfect control for the SHR in terms of behavior and with respect to the brain atrophy that is selectively observed in this strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We originally chose four exploratory trials in Birrell and Brown (2000) because, whilst the rat was equally likely to dig in the unbaited bowl, they would have the opportunity to obtain a reward from each of the two baited bowls in each of the choice chambers twice (see section 4.5.1 above). The majority of publications use four exploratory trials (Brooks et al, 2012;Cain et al, 2011;Cheng and Li, 2013;McCoy et al, 2007;Nikiforuk et al, 2010), although some do not report whether they have any (Lapiz and Morilak, 2006), and some use fewer (Broberg et al, 2008;Goetghebeur and Dias, 2009). Some studies deviate slightly from this, either by not including exploratory trials in the TTC (Hatcher et al, 2005;Izquierdo et al, 2010;Nikiforuk et al, 2010), or by training to ten consecutively correct trials, but using six as the criterion during testing (Redrobe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Learning Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administration of methylphenidate in rodents does not affect reversal learning (Seu and Jentsch, 2009; Cheng and Li, 2013), although the latter authors observed beneficial effects in animals with reversal learning impairments (spontaneously hypertensive rats). Effects of amphetamine and methamphetamine on reversal learning have been variable, but possibly dose-dependent: high doses (5 mg/kg) impair reversal learning (Ridley et al, 1981; Arushanian and Baturin, 1982; Idris et al, 2005; Cheng et al, 2007; White et al, 2009; Izquierdo et al, 2010; Kosheleff et al, 2012; Talpos et al, 2012), while intermediate doses 1–2 mg/kg show no effect or improved learning (Wilpizeski and Hamilton, 1964; Kulig and Calhoun, 1972; Mead, 1974; Weiner and Feldon, 1986; Weiner et al, 1986; Daberkow et al, 2008; Pastuzyn et al, 2012; Soto et al, 2012) and low doses again impair reversal performance (Ridley et al, 1981; Idris et al, 2005).…”
Section: Pharmacological Manipulations In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the multiple and differential effects of psychostimulants on monoamine release in prefrontal and striatal regions it is often difficult to conclude whether these effects depend on increased DA release. Yet, for methylphenidate Cheng and Li (2013) showed that the beneficial effect were blocked by local injections with haloperidol in the OFC.…”
Section: Pharmacological Manipulations In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%