2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02459-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-operative patellar fracture during chronic patellar tendon rupture reconstruction: salvage and prophylactic modified techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty-eight studies were sent for data extraction after the screening process (Fig 1). Two studies were excluded because of insufficient reporting of patient demographics and outcomes, 18,33 two studies were excluded due to inadequate follow-up, 6,16 and 35 studies were excluded due to being level V evidence, 4,5,7,[9][10][11][12][13]15,[17][18][19][20]22,24,25,[27][28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]44,[46][47][48][49][50] leaving 9 studies for inclusion in our review. 3,8,14,21,23,26,32,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forty-eight studies were sent for data extraction after the screening process (Fig 1). Two studies were excluded because of insufficient reporting of patient demographics and outcomes, 18,33 two studies were excluded due to inadequate follow-up, 6,16 and 35 studies were excluded due to being level V evidence, 4,5,7,[9][10][11][12][13]15,[17][18][19][20]22,24,25,[27][28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]44,[46][47][48][49][50] leaving 9 studies for inclusion in our review. 3,8,14,21,23,26,32,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-eight studies were sent for data extraction after the screening process ( Fig 1 ). 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 Two studies were excluded because of insufficient reporting of patient demographics and outcomes, 18 , 33 two studies were excluded due to inadequate follow-up, 6 , 16 and 35 studies were excluded due to being level V evidence, 4 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 24 , ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%