2013
DOI: 10.4172/2168-9784.1000146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Operative Hemorrhage: A Review of Literature

Rahul Kathariya

Abstract: Despite the tremendous innovation in field of medical science and technology; intraoperative hemorrhage remains one of the major surgical complications encountered in day-to-day surgical practice. The morbidity and mortality associated with surgical hemorrhage are considerable and it remains a restraining factor for advanced surgical procedures. Intra operative hemorrhage may sometime cause significant complications and may even lead to alarming events.Clinical Significance: Clinicians should know the amount o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IAEs were defined as any iatrogenic harmful event occurring during the operation, which had not derived from standard course of operation. Intraoperative blood loss ≥500 mL was considered to be a hemorrhage because losing less than one unit of blood (≈500 mL) usually does not negatively condition of patient and does not lead to hypovolemia and hemorrhagic shock [9,10]. Indications for transfusion were hemorrhagic shock, hemoglobin ≤6 g % or 6–8 g % in the case of evidence for limited compensation and risk factors (e.g., coronary heart disease, systolic heart failure, insufficient cerebral vascular flow) or presence of the following symptoms: tachycardia, hypotension, acute coronary ischemia in electrocardiography (ECG), and acidosis [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IAEs were defined as any iatrogenic harmful event occurring during the operation, which had not derived from standard course of operation. Intraoperative blood loss ≥500 mL was considered to be a hemorrhage because losing less than one unit of blood (≈500 mL) usually does not negatively condition of patient and does not lead to hypovolemia and hemorrhagic shock [9,10]. Indications for transfusion were hemorrhagic shock, hemoglobin ≤6 g % or 6–8 g % in the case of evidence for limited compensation and risk factors (e.g., coronary heart disease, systolic heart failure, insufficient cerebral vascular flow) or presence of the following symptoms: tachycardia, hypotension, acute coronary ischemia in electrocardiography (ECG), and acidosis [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative adverse events/complications were defined as any iatrogenic harmful event occurring during the operation, which had not derived from the standard technique. Intraoperative blood loss equal to or greater than 500 ml was considered to be a hemorrhage and was included as an intraoperative complication, because losing less than one unit of blood (≈500 ml) usually does not negatively affect the condition of the patient and does not lead to hypovolemia and hemorrhagic shock [ 5 , 6 ]. Indications for transfusion were: hemorrhagic shock, hemoglobin ≤ 6 g% or 6–8 g% in case of evidence for limited compensation and risk factors (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intraoperative blood loss (IBL) [30] = (the weight of the gauze pads and compresses with bloodthe dry weight of the gauze pads and compresses) + (the volume collected by the aspiratorsthe volume used to wash the surgical area).…”
Section: Primary Outcomes Perioperative Blood Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%