1973
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1973.10734965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Individual Variability of Normal and Educable Mentally Retarded Children on a Coincidence Timing Task

Abstract: A visual coincidence timing task was used to compare the level of performance (constant error) and the intra-individual variability of 100 normal and 100 educable mentally retarded children. The mean performance of the intellectually normal children on this task was significantly superior to that of the retarded children, and the intra-individual variability of the latter was significantly greater than that of the former. The hypothesis that high intra-individual variability and depressed level of performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short the timing responses became advanced similar to that developed in the case of the EMR children in the study by McGowan, Dobbins, and Rarick [8]. It is consistent that if a normal subject can become similar in timing response to a retardate by use of a depressant, then the retardate should show more normal characteristics with respect to timing responses by application of a stimulant.…”
Section: Inputsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In short the timing responses became advanced similar to that developed in the case of the EMR children in the study by McGowan, Dobbins, and Rarick [8]. It is consistent that if a normal subject can become similar in timing response to a retardate by use of a depressant, then the retardate should show more normal characteristics with respect to timing responses by application of a stimulant.…”
Section: Inputsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The state of a given system is independent of any other system, because Is is purely a function of that system. Hypothesis 1 is supported by questions 5, 8, and 9 although only 66.7% felt that decisions are based on inputs [8]. Hypothesis 2 is supported by questions 2, 5, and 10.…”
Section: Applicable Studiesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recent studies involving reaction time or coi[lcidence-timing tasks have indicated that the within-subject variability (or variable error, VE) of the retarded is also greater than that of intellectually normal children (Baumeister & Kellas, 1968;Berkson & Baumeister, 1967;Caffrey, Jones, & Hinkle, 1971;McGown, Dobbins, & Rarick, 1973;Weaver & Raveris, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beyond the almost trivial observation that retarded children seem to perform less well than their normal peers (Rarick, 1973), no research has attempted to investigate the possible variation in the response parameters of motor-skill behavior. The only issue that has received some empirical attention has been that of response variability (McGown, Dobbins, & Rarick, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%