1999
DOI: 10.1142/s1363919699000219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Firm Learning in Technology Transfer: A Study of Taiwanese Information Technology Firms

Abstract: Int. J. Innov. Mgt. 1999.03:427-458. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 03/10/15. For personal use only. 428 V. Wong et al.This paper presents the results of a study of intra-firm learning in Taiwanese information technology firms. Focusing on 100 effective and less effective projects within 49 companies, the research finds that firms with a high level of absorptive capacity are able to transfer technology more effectively. Effective projects display lower barriers to the inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jansen et al, 2005;Lane et al, 2001;Liao et al, 2007;Vinding, 2006;Tu et al, 2006;Wong et al, 1999) attempt a more in-depth study of this process by formulating a multidimensional operationalization of absorptive capacity. They develop different multi-item instruments covering the set of aspects that embody absorptive capacity, such as methods of compensation, dominant logic, knowledge base, management practices, strategy, organizational structure, information management systems and organizational culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jansen et al, 2005;Lane et al, 2001;Liao et al, 2007;Vinding, 2006;Tu et al, 2006;Wong et al, 1999) attempt a more in-depth study of this process by formulating a multidimensional operationalization of absorptive capacity. They develop different multi-item instruments covering the set of aspects that embody absorptive capacity, such as methods of compensation, dominant logic, knowledge base, management practices, strategy, organizational structure, information management systems and organizational culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four dimensions of knowledge integration refer to knowledge acquisition [58,59], deconstruction [60], fusion [61,62], reconstruction [63], and include a total of 14 items. To highlight the context of the "supply chain cooperative network", the words "in a supply chain network" were added to certain measurement items.…”
Section: (3) Knowledge Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta and Govindarajan (2000) disaggregate this process into knowledge creation, acquisition, and retention while Davenport and Prusak (2000) suggested that learning consists of transmission, absorption and culminating in a behavioural change by the recipient. Many authors recognize the lack of absorptive capacity in the recipient as a friction which slows or prevents learning (Whangthomkum, Igel and Speece, 2006;Lin, Tan and Change 2002;Davenport and Prusak, 2000;Wong, Shaw and Sher, 1999;Kim, 1997). Cohen and Levinthal (1990) in their seminal work highlighted the fact that organizations cannot benefit from external knowledge flows just by being exposed to them; instead, they must develop absorptive capacity which authors define as the ability to recognize the value of new external knowledge and then assimilate and utilise such knowledge for commercial ends or beneficial end.…”
Section: Learning Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%