2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02157-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-class and inter-class tool discrimination through micro-CT analysis of false starts on bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, micro-CT analysis of false starts (Fig. 3D) produced by different hand saws on human bones allowed the correct coupling of tool marks and classes of saws [35,36] and also the differentiation of false starts produced by saws belonging to the same class [37], with a high level of accuracy and precision [38]. Moreover, a random forest statistical regression model was proposed to enable prediction of saw blade thickness from empirical data [39] and 3D printed models deriving from micro-CT scans were used in forensic cases of dismemberment to detect several cut marks and false starts and identify the tools used by the murderer [40].…”
Section: Tool Markmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, micro-CT analysis of false starts (Fig. 3D) produced by different hand saws on human bones allowed the correct coupling of tool marks and classes of saws [35,36] and also the differentiation of false starts produced by saws belonging to the same class [37], with a high level of accuracy and precision [38]. Moreover, a random forest statistical regression model was proposed to enable prediction of saw blade thickness from empirical data [39] and 3D printed models deriving from micro-CT scans were used in forensic cases of dismemberment to detect several cut marks and false starts and identify the tools used by the murderer [40].…”
Section: Tool Markmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gong et al proposed to maximize interclass variance and minimize intraclass variance to calculate the dispersion ratio and filtered out the best feature subsets to improve model performance [25]. Chiara et al calculated the intraclass and interclass distance to obtain the dispersion ratio of the micro-CT samples, and the damage categories were distinguished by the dispersion ratio [26]. Then, the distance measurement weight is obtained by computing the ReliefF distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%