2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-assemblage variation in the macro-blade assemblage from the 1963 excavation at Shuidonggou locality 1, northern China, in the context of regional variation

Abstract: The emergence of the Upper Paleolithic and regional variability in early Upper Paleolithic industries are prominent topics in Paleolithic archaeology, with special relevance to the dispersal and differentiation of early modern human cultures across Eurasia. The so-called Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) has been considered a key element in the emergence of the Upper Paleolithic in northern Asia. Here, we examine the intra-assemblage variation in the collection from the 1963 excavation at Shuidonggou locality 1,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the bulk of the chronological data available for SDG1 and SDG2, earlier dates are more reliable than the few late ones and place the blade assemblages between 41 and 34 ka cal BP [ 9 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 81 ]. These dates are broadly consistent with a scenario of human population dispersals from the Eurasian Steppe [ 20 , 21 , 25 , 26 ], from North Mongolia [ 27 , 82 ], and/or the Altai [ 53 ]. After 34 ka cal BP, however, the unequivocal predominance of CFAs in North China suggests that the occurrence of blades is only a short episode in the region’s technological sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the bulk of the chronological data available for SDG1 and SDG2, earlier dates are more reliable than the few late ones and place the blade assemblages between 41 and 34 ka cal BP [ 9 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 81 ]. These dates are broadly consistent with a scenario of human population dispersals from the Eurasian Steppe [ 20 , 21 , 25 , 26 ], from North Mongolia [ 27 , 82 ], and/or the Altai [ 53 ]. After 34 ka cal BP, however, the unequivocal predominance of CFAs in North China suggests that the occurrence of blades is only a short episode in the region’s technological sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The lack of blade elements in these later assemblages cannot be explained solely by deposition processes, because no significant post-depositional transport has been identified [ 30 , 55 ]. Nor can it be easily attributed to raw material quality or availability as the blade assemblages from SDG1 and SDG2 are made on the same local raw materials as the CFAs [ 53 , 54 ]. SDG2 was described as a residential camp [ 50 , 63 ], with a lithic production characterized by an expedient pattern and showing a low frequency of artifact recycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Sitlivy et al (1997) consider that asymmetrical forms (then called 'sub-volumetric') are the end of a reduction process during which the core was mostly flat. Blades with proximal thinning found in the Altai are rare in the Baikal region and in Mongolia (Rybin 2000(Rybin , 2014, and in North China, blade intentional breakage and BCR are rare (Kuhn 2019;Li et al 2020). Another way to look at variations would be to consider that innovation, and the transmission of cultural information is tightly linked with demography.…”
Section: Technocomplexes Culture Groups and Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%