2018
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra‐articular injection of autologous adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Abstract: The results obtained in the present study provide good basis for prospective randomized controlled clinical trials with respect to the use of AD-MSCs in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If non‐surgical approaches are not successful, treatment options for advanced OA are limited to partial or total knee arthroplasty, while focal chondral defects can be treated with joint preserving options, including marrow stimulation with or without augmentation, osteochondral autografts and allografts, cell‐based therapy, scaffolds, osteotomy, and meniscal transplantation . In addition to traditional OA treatments, advanced biologic options have recently been used clinically with some success including platelet‐rich plasma, adipose‐derived stem cells, bone marrow‐derived cells, allogenic mesenchymal stem cells, and autologous protein solution (APS) . Furthermore, a pilot clinical study evaluating the safety profile of ASA was recently published by Vines et al confirming the safety of ASA for injection and suggesting a clinical benefit for up to 1 year based on patient‐reported outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If non‐surgical approaches are not successful, treatment options for advanced OA are limited to partial or total knee arthroplasty, while focal chondral defects can be treated with joint preserving options, including marrow stimulation with or without augmentation, osteochondral autografts and allografts, cell‐based therapy, scaffolds, osteotomy, and meniscal transplantation . In addition to traditional OA treatments, advanced biologic options have recently been used clinically with some success including platelet‐rich plasma, adipose‐derived stem cells, bone marrow‐derived cells, allogenic mesenchymal stem cells, and autologous protein solution (APS) . Furthermore, a pilot clinical study evaluating the safety profile of ASA was recently published by Vines et al confirming the safety of ASA for injection and suggesting a clinical benefit for up to 1 year based on patient‐reported outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies lead to improved volume retention lacking cysts and necrotic tissue (Li et al, 2017). Similar to the described approach, the enrichment of the SVF together with matrix and microvasculature may contribute substantially to the superior quality of these grafting materials (Feng et al, 2015;van Dongen et al, 2016). In comparison to the standard-SVF, the microtissue-SVF demonstrated a highly elevated potential to form tube-like structures in vitro, indicative of its angiogenic potential in vivo.…”
Section: Fig 4 Flow Cytometry Analysis Of Svf Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Enhanced wound healing properties are demonstrated with a fat graft termed ECM/SVF-gel, secreting high MCP-1 and angiogenic factors (Liu et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2017), suggesting wound healing as another field of application for the microtissue-SVF. A high angiogenic potential particularity predestines the material for regeneration of large areas of vascularised tissues, such as large skin defects and bone replacement (Jacobsen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Fig 4 Flow Cytometry Analysis Of Svf Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases there are reported improvements to cartilage morphology . Although clinical trials of BM‐MSCs have reported efficacy at higher doses ranging from 25 × 10 6 cells and 40 × 10 6 cells , efficacy has been reported with lower doses of adipose tissue‐derived MSC suggestive of tissue‐specific differences in dosing efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%