2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-articular injection of a mixture of hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid versus arthrocentesis in TMJ internal derangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Marzook et al [80] compared the efficacy of an intra-articular injection of a mixture of a hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid with arthrocentesis alone. The authors stated no significant differences between the two groups regarding the intensity of pain, maximum mouth opening, lateral movement and joint sound.…”
Section: Intra-articular Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marzook et al [80] compared the efficacy of an intra-articular injection of a mixture of a hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid with arthrocentesis alone. The authors stated no significant differences between the two groups regarding the intensity of pain, maximum mouth opening, lateral movement and joint sound.…”
Section: Intra-articular Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, intra-articular injections with corticosteroids have also been successfully used for different TMJ conditions, despite their potential adverse effects such as progression of a pre-existing joint lesion [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Corticosteroid therapy is usually combined with a local anesthetic, an association that, although controversial, is believed by certain authors to decrease the risk of complications compared to the isolated administration of corticosteroids [13,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] More recently, Marzook et al ., compared the outcome of TMJ arthrocentesis vs. injection with hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids on 16 patients, he concluded that both treatments were effective to treat the disease with no statistical difference, however the follow-up period was limited to 3 months post-operatively. [ 16 ] In a study published in 2020, a novel protocol for TMJ disease treatment utilizing a computer assisted arthrocentesis was used. [ 17 ] In his study, Mahmoud et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%