2020
DOI: 10.18699/vj19.582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and interspecific variability of <i>Mentha arvensis</i> L. and <i>M. Canadensis</i> L.

Abstract: The identification of plants of the genus Mentha is often difficult due to significant intraspecific polymorphism, intense interspecific hybridization, and ploidy changes. An attempt was made to apply an integrated approach to the study of different parameters of two species: Mentha arvensis L. and M. canadensis L. Eight geographically dispersed populations of Mentha in different regions (European Russia, Khakassia and Far East, Western Ukraine, and Indochina) were studied. Diagnostic morphological characters … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) may suggest the occurrence of seed propagation in the Southeast Asian lines and/or multiple introductions. Although cornmints can be classified into two species (M. arvensis and M. canadensis L.), both species are difficult to identify, and their identification often leads to disagreements (Semenova et al 2019). We have here treated the cornmint lines as a single species, M. arvensis.…”
Section: Previewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) may suggest the occurrence of seed propagation in the Southeast Asian lines and/or multiple introductions. Although cornmints can be classified into two species (M. arvensis and M. canadensis L.), both species are difficult to identify, and their identification often leads to disagreements (Semenova et al 2019). We have here treated the cornmint lines as a single species, M. arvensis.…”
Section: Previewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DNA and species delimitation criteria have been successfully used for the detection of such species [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. While molecular markers can be useful in deciphering complex relationships, they can sometimes be insufficient on their own (e.g., [ 17 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%