2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra and intersession repeatability and reliability of the S-Plate® pressure platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the methodological aspects, in the present study, instructions regarding where to look, posture and gait were not performed, which is in agreement with previous studies [20,22,23]. It is noteworthy that laboratory analysis alone modifies patterns of posture and movement, known as the Hawthorne effect [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding the methodological aspects, in the present study, instructions regarding where to look, posture and gait were not performed, which is in agreement with previous studies [20,22,23]. It is noteworthy that laboratory analysis alone modifies patterns of posture and movement, known as the Hawthorne effect [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Here, Perinetti et al 56 confirm an acceptable reliability for the sway area and velocity, but recommend to include a threshold of 25%, if at least two different conditions are to be compared with each other. Intersession reliability was also proven by Baldini et al 57 For the ‘S-Plate’, a pressure measuring platform similar to the one used here with a larger sensor size and smaller number of sensors, good reliability and reproducibility could be observed 58. Consequently, the pressure platform is suitable to represent postural standard values, but it must be considered that the sensors are temperature-sensitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…All ICCs were greater than 0.9 for all measured dynamic variables and the highest CoV was 1.7%, which was concordant with the outcomes from previous studies. 22,25,43 We did not find any significant differences between the first and second sessions when comparing means, with P-values > 0.05. All of the variables evaluated were highly homogeneous across all LLD conditions and for both feet.…”
Section: Gurney Et Al Conducted a Study On The Between-day Reli-mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These results indicated that the reliability measurements were higher than those in other similar studies. 22,43 One explanation for this may be that the measurements were obtained using the multiple dynamic mode of the platform. In this mode, the platform software automatically provides the average results from four measurements for each foot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%