Intra‐ and interobserver agreement in computed tomography localization of primary nonhematopoietic hepatic masses and comparison with surgical and histopathological outcomes in 21 cats

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in the staging of hepatic masses and for liver lobectomy planning. Mass location is an important factor in determining the feasibility of resection, including surgical technique and the likelihood of surgical complications. The objectives of this retrospective descriptive cross‐sectional, observer agreement, method comparison study were to assess the reliability of CT in correctly determining the hepatic division and lobar site of origin of feline primary nonhematopoietic hepatic masses, compared with surgically confirmed locations. Furthermore, it provides an overview of the types and locations of liver masses found in a cohort of cats. Pre‐ and postcontrast CT images of 21 cats were independently and simultaneously reviewed by two observers. Intra‐ and interobserver agreements and descriptive statistics on demographic and histological diagnoses were calculated. Based on surgical assessment, it was found that masses most frequently originated from the left hepatic division (13/24, 54%). The most frequent lobar origins were the left lateral (8/24, 33%), left medial (5/24, 21%), and right medial lobes (5/24, 21%). No masses were found originating from the right lateral lobe. CT correctly determined hepatic division and lobar origin in 76% of cases, with good‐to‐excellent intra‐ and interobserver agreement. The hepatic division had higher agreements overall for both observers. Most of the masses were benign (17/21, 81%), and the most prevalent histological diagnoses were biliary cystadenoma (11/21, 52%) and hepatocellular adenoma (6/21, 29%). Findings suggest that postcontrast CT is a reliable method for correctly determining hepatic mass division and lobar origin in cats.