2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and interindividual differences in lateralized cognitive performance and asymmetrical EEG activity in the frontal cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some individuals show strong left-hemispheric language lateralization, others strong-right-hemispheric language lateralization, and still others possess a more bilateral language representation (Knecht et al, 2000). Even within individuals lateralization changes as a function of, for example, sex hormones (Hausmann and Güntürkün, 2000; Bayer and Hausmann, 2009; Hjelmervik et al, 2012) or emotional states (Papousek et al, 2011, 2012). However, not much is known about how degree of lateralization and performance in selected functions are related, which we refer to as the “asymmetry-performance relationship”, and the few studies available provide incoherent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some individuals show strong left-hemispheric language lateralization, others strong-right-hemispheric language lateralization, and still others possess a more bilateral language representation (Knecht et al, 2000). Even within individuals lateralization changes as a function of, for example, sex hormones (Hausmann and Güntürkün, 2000; Bayer and Hausmann, 2009; Hjelmervik et al, 2012) or emotional states (Papousek et al, 2011, 2012). However, not much is known about how degree of lateralization and performance in selected functions are related, which we refer to as the “asymmetry-performance relationship”, and the few studies available provide incoherent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymmetry ratio is equivalent to another common metric (ln R – ln L ), with which it is virtually perfectly correlated (Davidson, 1988 ; Papousek & Schulter, 2002 ). However, LC allows easier comparison of data from different studies, different frequency bands, and locations (Pivik et al., 1993 ), and has been used in numerous EEG studies in relevant research contexts (e.g., Papousek et al., 2011 , 2014 ; Papousek, Reiser, et al., 2013 ; Papousek, Reiser, Weber, Freudenthaler, & Schulter, 2012 ; Papousek & Schulter, 2004 ; Papousek, Schulter, et al., 2013 ). Positive values of LC indicate relatively greater left than right hemisphere cortical activity (inverse of alpha).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These asymmetry changes, recorded in a respective context, index the individual’s capability to effectively process the specific demands and, consequently, may be indicative of traits related to psychological health and well-being (see also Allen & Reznik, 2015 ; Beeney, Levy, Gatzke-Kopp, & Hallquist, 2014 ; Cole, Zapp, Nelson, & Perez-Edgar, 2012 ; Goodman, Rietschel, Lo, Costanzo, & Hatfield, 2013 ; Liu, Sarapas, & Shankman, 2016 ; Papousek, Reiser, et al., 2013 , 2014 ; Pérez-Edgar, Kujawa, Nelson, Cole, & Zapp, 2013 ; Stewart, Coan, Towers, & Allen, 2014 ). More generally, several studies indicated functional deficits when brain circuits that are associated with these functions were inadequately activated, and that lateralized activation of specific relevant brain regions was linked to better performance on associated tasks (Davidson, Chapman, Chapman, & Henriques, 1990 ; Gur et al., 1994 , 2000 ; Gur & Reivich, 1980 ; Papousek, Murhammer, & Schulter, 2011 ; Papousek & Schulter, 2004 ; Wendt & Risberg, 1994 ). The capability model represents one of several important advancements of prefrontal brain asymmetry research that in part may be hampered by too simplistic approaches such as the reliance on resting data (see Miller, Crocker, Spielberg, Infantolino, & Heller, 2013 for a critical review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EEG studies, this asymmetry ratio is equivalent to another common metric (lnR - lnL), with which it is virtually perfectly correlated (Davidson 1988; Papousek and Schulter 2002). However, LC allows easier comparison of data from different studies, different frequency bands, and locations (Pivik et al 1993), and has been used in numerous EEG studies in relevant research contexts (e.g., Papousek et al 2011, 2012, 2013a, b, 2014; Papousek and Schulter 2004). Following the common approach in EEG alpha asymmetry research, we interpret relatively lower alpha power in one hemisphere than the other as relatively greater cortical activity in this hemisphere (see, Allen et al 2004 for a review of evidence and Harmon-Jones 2006; Michels et al 2010; Scheeringa et al 2011 for recent experimental research supporting the assumption that EEG alpha band activity obtained in time frames of several seconds or minutes is inversely related to cortical activity).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the absence of left-lateralized activation and the increased activation in right prefrontal cortex indicated an inappropriate or inefficient engagement of prefrontal regulatory circuitry, which may be linked to the difficulties of depressed patients to adequately cope with adverse events. More generally, several empirical studies indicated functional deficits, if a brain region on which these functions depend was inadequately activated, and that lateralized activation of specific relevant brain regions was associated with better performance on hemisphere specific cognitive tasks (Davidson et al 1990; Gur et al 1994, 2000; Gur and Reivich 1980; Papousek et al 2011; Papousek and Schulter 2004; Wendt and Risberg 1994). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%