2017
DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2016.1262726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra and intergeneric transferable gene-derived orthologous microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus and Corymbia species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This showed that Eucalyptus sp. and E. urophylla were the highest gene diversity, followed by E. globulus, C. citriodora, E. deglupta, and E. pellita compared to previous studies (Nurtjahjaningsih et al 2013;Kotrappa et al 2017;and Liu et al 2018b). The genetic diversity of E. globulus, C. citriodora, E. deglupta was not significantly high compared to Eucalyptus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This showed that Eucalyptus sp. and E. urophylla were the highest gene diversity, followed by E. globulus, C. citriodora, E. deglupta, and E. pellita compared to previous studies (Nurtjahjaningsih et al 2013;Kotrappa et al 2017;and Liu et al 2018b). The genetic diversity of E. globulus, C. citriodora, E. deglupta was not significantly high compared to Eucalyptus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This study determined the genetic diversity and population structure of Corymbia and Eucalyptus species using 14 SSR markers. Although the success rate of genomic SSR marker in eucalypt from is transferable, it is relatively low (>50%) compared to cross-species transferability on other eucalypt species (Subashini et al 2014;Kotrappa et al 2017;Liu et al 2018b). Many isolated SSR markers from E. grandis and E. urophylla (EMBRA code) were cross-amplified in different Eucalyptus species such as E. globulus, E. pilularis, E. nitens, E. urophylla, E. pyrocarpa, E. camaldulensis, and E. tereticornis (Bundock et al 2000;Steane et al 2001;Glaubitz et al 2001;Agrama et al 2002;Ottewell et al 2005;Arumugasundaram et al 2011;Subashini et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study followed an established procedure for developing and identifying SSR markers (Rosetto, 2003;Selkoe & Toonen, 2006), beginning with a literature review focusing on microsatellite primers developed for taxa closely related to F. amethystina and F. tatrae. This approach is a straightforward and inexpensive method that has already been used in previous studies (Cordeiro et al, 2001;Rosetto, 2003;Saha et al, 2004;Giraldo et al, 2005;Huang et al, 2016;Mansour, Bryngelsson & Garkawa-Gustavvson, 2016;Kotrappa, Hendre & Rathinavelu, 2017).…”
Section: Identifying Accurate Ssr Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf samples collected from young leaves were powdered using liquid nitrogen and stored in -80° C. Genomic DNA was isolated from the young leaf tissues using the modified CTAB protocol described by Hendre et al (2012). Twelve polymorphic SSR primers were selected for marker analysis by capillary genotyping adopting two-tier PCR system described by Nagabhushana et al (2017).…”
Section: Genotypic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%