2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra- and inter-population analysis of haplotype diversity in Yfiler ® Plus system using a wide set of representative data from Polish population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high level of similarity between both datasets is visible; however, lack of prediction for 140 samples (>25% of the studied sample set) seems to be the main reason for the inconsistencies found. One of those is the overrepresentation of haplogroup R1a [56.93 vs. 68.6%-haplogroup prediction based on Spolnicka et al (2017)] and the remaining-the underrepresentation of hg I [15.71 vs. 6.8%-haplogroup prediction based on Spolnicka et al (2017)]. The frequencies of some of the remaining haplogroups predicted (R1b, N, G, Q) are consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Interpopulation Variability Of Y Chromosomesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A high level of similarity between both datasets is visible; however, lack of prediction for 140 samples (>25% of the studied sample set) seems to be the main reason for the inconsistencies found. One of those is the overrepresentation of haplogroup R1a [56.93 vs. 68.6%-haplogroup prediction based on Spolnicka et al (2017)] and the remaining-the underrepresentation of hg I [15.71 vs. 6.8%-haplogroup prediction based on Spolnicka et al (2017)]. The frequencies of some of the remaining haplogroups predicted (R1b, N, G, Q) are consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Interpopulation Variability Of Y Chromosomesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As an insight into the most recent Polish population, we performed a haplogroup prediction based on 496 27-Y-STR haplotypes published in 2017 by Spolnicka et al (2017). A high level of similarity between both datasets is visible; however, lack of prediction for 140 samples (>25% of the studied sample set) seems to be the main reason for the inconsistencies found.…”
Section: Interpopulation Variability Of Y Chromosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplications at DYF387S1 produced two instances of tri-allelic patterns similar to those reported in several populations (Ye et al 2015 ; Pickrahn et al 2016 ; Wang et al 2016 ; Iacovacci et al 2017 ; Spólnicka et al 2017 ; Watahiki et al 2019 ). In one predicted haplogroup J1a male the alleles 36, 37 and 38 were all detected with equal strength implying an equal copy number, as would be seen if just one DYF387S1 copy had been duplicated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A neighbor‐joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of the Rst genetic matrixes using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0 (MEGA 6.0) (Tamura et al, 2013). The 67 reference groups included 22 Chinese populations (Fan et al, 2019; Gayden et al, 2012; Hu et al, 2017; Ji et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2001; Liu et al, 2019; Luo et al, 2019; Song et al, 2020; Sun et al, 2019; Tang et al, 2020; Xie et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2014; Yin et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2016) and 45 worldwide populations (Aliferi et al, 2018; D'Atanasio et al, 2019; Füredi et al, 1999; García et al, 2016; Hallenberg et al, 2005; Henry et al, 2019; Jankauskiene et al, 2017; Jankova et al, 2019; Pickrahn et al, 2016; Purps et al, 2014; Rapone et al, 2016; Shonhai et al, 2020; Spólnicka et al, 2017; Watahiki et al, 2019; Zgonjanin et al, 2017; Zhabagin et al, 2019) and the information about these groups are listed in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%