Intra-and inter-observer variability of point of care ultrasound measurements to evaluate hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers

Abstract

Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool for assessing the hemodynamic status of acute patients. Even though POCUS often uses a qualitative approach, quantitative measurements have potential advantages in evaluating hemodynamic status. Several quantitative ultrasound parameters can be used to assess the hemodynamic status and cardiac function. However, only limited data on the feasibility and reliability of the quantitative hemodynamic measurements in the point-of-care setting are available. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer variability of PoCUS measurements of quantitative hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers. Methods In this prospective observational study, three sonographers performed three repeated measurements of eight different hemodynamic parameters in healthy subjects. An expert panel of two experienced sonographers evaluated the images’ quality. The repeatability (intra-observer variability) was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) between the separate measurements for each observer. The reproducibility (inter-observer variability) was assessed by determining the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results 32 subjects were included in this study, on whom, in total, 1502 images were obtained for analysis. All parameters were in a normal physiological range. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-D) showed high repeatability (CV under 10%) and substantial reproducibility (ICC 0.61–0.80). The other parameters had only moderate repeatability and reproducibility. Conclusions We demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility and good intra-observer repeatability for CO, SV and IVC-D taken in healthy subjects by emergency care physicians.

Reliability and reproducibility of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, a multi-site prospective study: validating a novel ultrasound technique for comprehensive assessment of venous congestion

“…We found substantial IRR for the VExUS score between multiple readers and IUR between images acquired from the same patient by sequential ultrasonographers. The IRR of the VExUS exam as collected and interpreted by physicians was superior the reported IRR of IVC measurement in a group of emergency department physicians [ 15 ], and similar to the IRR of IVC measurements when collected by professional ultrasonographers [ 16 ]. Though substantial, the KS for the VExUS grade was lower than reported in a recent study of VExUS in patients with septic shock, which reported a KS of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90–1.0) between two experts [ 17 ].…”

Inspiratory-expiratory variation of pleural line thickness in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure

“…Given the very low CV, [ 11 ] this work also demonstrates the repeatability of pleural thickness measurement using high-frequency ultrasound. This can be interesting as these probes have higher superficial resolution and can be used for the same purpose in adults too.…”

“…A CV of less than 10% was considered as low data dispersion (i.e. : good repeatability), as previously published [ 11 ]. As this was the first study of its kind, a formal sample size calculation was unfeasible and we choose a convenience sample size of 100 neonates, which was larger than the unique preliminary neonatal study available [ 5 ].…”

Multi-modality imaging for assessment of the microcirculation in peripheral artery disease: Bench to clinical practice

“…ABI does not assess the microcirculation, and ABIs do not correlate with the degree of MVD [ 22 , 23 ]. In terms of imaging, duplex Doppler and computed tomography (CT) angiography are frequently used to assess PAD anatomy and severity, and while these approaches offer a reasonable assessment of large vessel anatomy, they do not assess microcirculation under standard protocols [ 24 , 25 ].…”