Fetal abdominal wall defects in an Australian tertiary setting: contemporary characteristics, ultrasound accuracy and outcome
PurposeIn this study we aimed to comprehensively evaluate risk factors, ultrasound estimation of fetal weight, prenatal management and pregnancy outcomes of gastroschisis and omphalocele at a metropolitan Australian hospital.
Material and MethodsThis was a retrospective single centre cohort study from 2006 to 2014 at a tertiary hospital with co-located neonatal surgical facilities. Demographic, pregnancy, ultrasound, birth and neonatal data were compared between gastroschisis and omphalocele. Correlation between routine (Hadlock 1&2) and specific (Siemer) estimated fetal weight (EFW) estimation formulae with birth weight (BW) was made for those 50 cases with ≥2 third trimester scans and last scan ≤2 week prior to birth.
ResultsThere were 126 abdominal wall defects: 83 gastroschisis and 43 omphalocele.Consistent with international literature, average maternal age was lower for gastroschisis and rates of smoking higher, while there were more intrauterine deaths and pregnancy terminations in omphalocele. Gastroschisis mothers were more likely living outside Sydney, had more infections in pregnancy and were followed with a larger number of antenatal visits, with a shorter period from last visit to birth. In omphalocele pregnancies amniocentesis were more likely performed, with more abnormal results than in gastroschisis fetuses. All EFW formulae had good correlation between Z score for last US and actual BW (ICC 0.693-0.815), with Hadlock 2 being the best. Siemer formula had the best correlation from first to last scan. Gastroschisis newborns were born earlier (36.8 vs. 38.2 wks. P=0.001), with smaller birthweight (2.52 vs. 3.03 kg, p<0.001), a longer request of intensive care (central line, parenteral nutrition, intubation) and second surgery, along with more multisystem complications (average 1.5 vs. 0.7, p=0.004) and a longer hospital stay (58.8 vs. 36.8 days, p<0.001).
ConclusionDemographic, antenatal and pregnancy outcome data for abdominal wall defects correlated well with the international literature. Hadlock 1-2 gave most consistent EFW estimate, all formulae showing good correlation.