2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-Accumbens Baclofen, But Not Muscimol, Increases Second Order Instrumental Responding for Food Reward in Rats

Abstract: Stimulation of either GABAA or GABAB receptors within the nucleus accumbens shell strongly enhances food intake in rats. However the effects of subtype-selective stimulation of GABA receptors on instrumental responses for food reward are less well characterized. Here we contrast the effects of the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol and GABAB receptor agonist baclofen on instrumental responding for food using a second order reinforcement schedule. Bilateral intra-accumbens administration of baclofen (220–440 pmol)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the NAc restricts intake via control over the motor behaviors that comprise a feeding response (Kelley et al, 2005). We find that the mNAc!VTA circuitry bidirectionally regulates instrumental actions, not solely food consumption actions, consistent with previous reports that pharmacological inhibition of the NAc increases operant responding for food (Pulman et al, 2012;Stratford and Wirtshafter, 2012b). However, we did not find a statistically significant effect on locomotion or activity alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been proposed that the NAc restricts intake via control over the motor behaviors that comprise a feeding response (Kelley et al, 2005). We find that the mNAc!VTA circuitry bidirectionally regulates instrumental actions, not solely food consumption actions, consistent with previous reports that pharmacological inhibition of the NAc increases operant responding for food (Pulman et al, 2012;Stratford and Wirtshafter, 2012b). However, we did not find a statistically significant effect on locomotion or activity alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Obese humans chronically treated with the opioid antagonist GSK1521498 show a reduction in the responsiveness of the pallidum, probably including the VP, to images of high-calorie palatable foods as well as a reduction in a novel measure of motivational responding (Cambridge et al, 2013). Infusion of both GABA-A and GABA-B receptor agonists into the NAc shell leads to a profound activation of feeding behaviour (Stratford and Kelley, 1997), although only GABA-A receptor stimulation leads to enhanced instrumental responding for food (Pulman et al, 2012). One mechanism through which NAc (shell) stimulation of GABA receptors may affect feeding behaviour is by stimulating the population of orexin-expressing cells in the LH (Baldo et al, 2004).…”
Section: Physiological and Neural Substrates For Hunger And Satietymentioning
confidence: 99%