2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00068-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-abdominal gastrointestinal tract injuries following blunt trauma: the experience of an Australian trauma centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
29
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, clinical assessment can be unreliable in patients following blunt trauma due to distracting injuries, head and spinal cord injuries, and shock. Less than 50% of gastrointestinal tract injuries resulting from blunt trauma are reported to have sufficient clinical findings to indicate the need for laparotomy [10] . In this study, 3 patients with unstable haemodynamics undergoing immediate laparotomy (< 2 h) showed marked evidence for abdominal injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, clinical assessment can be unreliable in patients following blunt trauma due to distracting injuries, head and spinal cord injuries, and shock. Less than 50% of gastrointestinal tract injuries resulting from blunt trauma are reported to have sufficient clinical findings to indicate the need for laparotomy [10] . In this study, 3 patients with unstable haemodynamics undergoing immediate laparotomy (< 2 h) showed marked evidence for abdominal injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvik fraktür varlığında ise rektum yaralanması gelişebilir. 33 İntestinal ve mezenterik yaralanmaların tanısı semptomların geç ortaya çıkabilmesi nedeniyle zordur. Fizik muayenenin sensitivite ve spesifitesi yoktur.…”
Section: Barsak Ve Mezenterunclassified
“…These lesions occur as a result of high energy trauma involving motor vehicle accidents in 70-90% of cases. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The most common cause of HVI in our study is RTA (70%) and most of the patients were young and there is a need to focus on the preventive aspects also.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 74%