2007
DOI: 10.1515/text.2007.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intonation units in spoken interaction: Developing transcription skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons were facilitated by lengthy discussions of the annotation choices made until the underlying sources of disagreement were identified and resolved. We did not measure agreement by Kappa, as such measures can mask the underlying source of disagreement (Stelma & Cameron 2007) or erronerously indicate agreement (e.g. Uebersax 1987;Gnisci et al 2013).…”
Section: Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These comparisons were facilitated by lengthy discussions of the annotation choices made until the underlying sources of disagreement were identified and resolved. We did not measure agreement by Kappa, as such measures can mask the underlying source of disagreement (Stelma & Cameron 2007) or erronerously indicate agreement (e.g. Uebersax 1987;Gnisci et al 2013).…”
Section: Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stelma and Cameron 2007). Every line in a transcript was reserved for a single intonation unit defined conceptually as a single act of attention and linguistically (phonetically) the following perceptual criteria were used: a) changes in fundamental frequency (perceived as pitch), b) changes in duration (shortening or lengthening of a segment, a syllable or word), c) changes in intensity (perceived as loudness), d) alternations of vocalizations and silence (perceived as pausing), e) changes in voice quality (accelerations) of various kinds and changes in turn.…”
Section: Procedures and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discourse dynamics approach to metaphors in social interaction underlies the methodology of the study (Cameron 2007;Cameron, Maslen, Maule, Todd, Stratton & Stanley 2009) and is combined with a 'weak' version of conceptual metaphor theory (e.g. Lakoff 1993).…”
Section: The View Of Metaphor Adopted In This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts were formatted in intonation units following Chafe (1994) and Du Bois, Schuetze-Coburn, Cumming and Paolino (1993) (see Stelma & Cameron 2007 for a discussion of the use of intonation units in metaphor research). The transcription was orthographic, with pauses marked but not stress.…”
Section: Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation