Parenthesis and Ellipsis 2015
DOI: 10.1515/9781614514831.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intonation phrases and speech acts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study supports Kan (2009), Selkirk (2011 and Truckenbrodt (2005Truckenbrodt ( , 2014, in that syntactic structures that are used as speech acts are parsed as intonational phrases due to the fact that they are Force ill Ps. However, the arguments of this paper differ from these studies, in that this paper claims that not all parentheticals function as speech acts, and not all Force ill Ps dominate a clausal structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of this study supports Kan (2009), Selkirk (2011 and Truckenbrodt (2005Truckenbrodt ( , 2014, in that syntactic structures that are used as speech acts are parsed as intonational phrases due to the fact that they are Force ill Ps. However, the arguments of this paper differ from these studies, in that this paper claims that not all parentheticals function as speech acts, and not all Force ill Ps dominate a clausal structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Selkirk (2005) suggests that in such constructions each focused phrase is parsed as an independent ı. Related to this, Truckenbrodt (2014) suggests that each focus expresses a separate claim (hence a separate speech act), which yields each focused XP to be parsed as ı in English and German. It may, perhaps, be the case that their status as ıs is triggered because each focused XP is immediately dominated by ForceillP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose that both the semantic notion of Speech Act and the syntactic notion of clause, understood as the highest phrase whose head is overtly filled by the verb or verbal material (HVP), are relevant for prosodic phrasing. Truckenbrodt (2015) and Selkirk (2011) proposed that the embedded clauses that form their own ι are those that constitute a speech act. Also inspired by Downing (1970) Truckenbrodt (2005Truckenbrodt ( , 2015 proposes a combination of Align (CP) and Wrap (CP).…”
Section: (6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truckenbrodt (2015) and Selkirk (2011) proposed that the embedded clauses that form their own ι are those that constitute a speech act. Also inspired by Downing (1970) Truckenbrodt (2005Truckenbrodt ( , 2015 proposes a combination of Align (CP) and Wrap (CP). We remain agnostic as to the exact formulation of this constraint, and adopt a short-hand notation SpA-ι for a constraint (or a group of constraints) that is violated whenever a speech act is not contained in a single ι.…”
Section: (6)mentioning
confidence: 99%