2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24019-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intonation in the Perception of Brummie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some elements of the selective resynthesis and suppression technique have been used previously using terms such as accent morphing and prosody transplantation in sociophonetic research (Boula de Mareüil and Boutin 2011;Drager 2010;Levon 2007;Leyden and Heuven 2006;Leyden 2004;Malarski 2013;Vaissière and Mareüil 2004) and research on the salient features in the foreign accents of language learners (Boula de Mareüil and Vieru-Dimulescu 2006;Jilka 2000a,b;Munro 1995). However, to the best of the author's knowledge, previous research has not attempted to resynthesise utterances by one speaker with the speech rhythm of another speaker and has not investigated the interaction of various prosodic and segmental features to the extent that the present study does.…”
Section: Bre Speakermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some elements of the selective resynthesis and suppression technique have been used previously using terms such as accent morphing and prosody transplantation in sociophonetic research (Boula de Mareüil and Boutin 2011;Drager 2010;Levon 2007;Leyden and Heuven 2006;Leyden 2004;Malarski 2013;Vaissière and Mareüil 2004) and research on the salient features in the foreign accents of language learners (Boula de Mareüil and Vieru-Dimulescu 2006;Jilka 2000a,b;Munro 1995). However, to the best of the author's knowledge, previous research has not attempted to resynthesise utterances by one speaker with the speech rhythm of another speaker and has not investigated the interaction of various prosodic and segmental features to the extent that the present study does.…”
Section: Bre Speakermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And broadly speaking, all accents by definition exhibit 'distinctive' sounds that identify the accent to interlocutors. Nonetheless, the choices I have made below pertain to what are arguably the more identifiable sounds associated with a given accent -reflective of what Cruttenden (2014) might refer to as 'distinctive vowels'; and the sounds selected are themselves informed by relevant literature on the representative accents within the table and their specific sound features: Liverpool (Honeybone, 2007;Watson, 2007); Birmingham (Clark & Asprey, 2013;Malarski, 2013); Newcastle (Beal, 1999;Jensen, 2016;Kerswill, 2002;Watt, 2000Watt, , 2002 and Yorkshire (Hickey, 2015;Stoddart et al, 1999;Strycharczuk et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Implications Of 'Standard' Uk Accentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have reviewed accent in detail (e.g. Coupland and Bishop 2007;Kerswill and Torgersen 2017;Lev-Ari and Keysar 2010;Malarski 2013;Moyer 2013). The purpose of this section is not a comprehensive account of accents, but rather to briefly highlight some research about three accents that are of relevance to the current work: Received Pronunciation (RP), Multicultural London English (MLE) and Birmingham.…”
Section: Some Uk Accentsmentioning
confidence: 99%