2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intonation and Gender Perception: Applications for Transgender Speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
59
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
59
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Voices that are perceived as feminine have a higher fundamental frequency than voices perceived as masculine, but there are other differences. Voices perceived as feminine are also characterized by more precise articulation, increased breathiness, more dynamic frequency changes, and prevalence of upward intonation . Also, the feminine voice is articulated more gently .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Voices that are perceived as feminine have a higher fundamental frequency than voices perceived as masculine, but there are other differences. Voices perceived as feminine are also characterized by more precise articulation, increased breathiness, more dynamic frequency changes, and prevalence of upward intonation . Also, the feminine voice is articulated more gently .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voices perceived as feminine are also characterized by more precise articulation, increased breathiness, more dynamic frequency changes, and prevalence of upward intonation. 1,2 Also, the feminine voice is articulated more gently. 3 Still, in multiple studies, the primary predictor for an observer to judge a voice as feminine was fundamental frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some MTF transgender talkers were perceived as male/masculine, others as female/feminine, and some with ambiguously perceived gender . Research with female‐to‐male transgender individuals has demonstrated similar findings in which talkers were not always perceived as unambiguously male or female in femininity/masculinity rating tasks . In these tasks, listeners employed a large range of the scale and did not appear to be biased toward the end points.…”
Section: Categorizing Classifyingand Rating Across‐talker Charactermentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In both identification tasks and rating tasks using a scale from ‘masculine male’ to ‘feminine female’ with the center of the scale labeled ‘feminine male/masculine female,’ male‐to‐female (MTF) transgender talkers varied widely in how listeners perceived their gender and femininity. Some MTF transgender talkers were perceived as male/masculine, others as female/feminine, and some with ambiguously perceived gender . Research with female‐to‐male transgender individuals has demonstrated similar findings in which talkers were not always perceived as unambiguously male or female in femininity/masculinity rating tasks .…”
Section: Categorizing Classifyingand Rating Across‐talker Charactermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite the fact that f0 is important to define gender, individual voice satisfaction is not necessarily related to f0 because the pitch is influenced by characteristics of the vocal filter. In addition, standard of intonation, articulation, resonance, speech speed, prolongation of vowels, and vocal psychodynamic also are markers of gender …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%