2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimate Partner Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ackerson & Subramanian 17 , the negative association between physical intimate partner violence and BMI results from the physically violent partner's intent to withhold food as a form of psychological abuse, ultimately preventing the woman from maintaining normal nutritional status. One can also conjecture that chronic daily stress for a poor woman suffering violence would lead to sleep disorders, alcohol and drug abuse, smoking, and reduced food intake 1,14,40 . In fact, this hypothesis is reinforced by evidence that stress increases the baseline metabolic rate and energy expenditure 41,42,43 , a process that can cause weight loss in individuals with adequate or low calorie intake 17 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ackerson & Subramanian 17 , the negative association between physical intimate partner violence and BMI results from the physically violent partner's intent to withhold food as a form of psychological abuse, ultimately preventing the woman from maintaining normal nutritional status. One can also conjecture that chronic daily stress for a poor woman suffering violence would lead to sleep disorders, alcohol and drug abuse, smoking, and reduced food intake 1,14,40 . In fact, this hypothesis is reinforced by evidence that stress increases the baseline metabolic rate and energy expenditure 41,42,43 , a process that can cause weight loss in individuals with adequate or low calorie intake 17 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research explaining the vast range of reported prevalence rates of emotional violence is limited. Some have argued that prevalence estimates vary significantly because of differences in definitions of emotional intimate partner violence used when collecting data (Saltzman et al 2002, Gunter 2007, Carney and Barner 2012, Mason et al 2014, Follingstad 2007). Several definitions of emotional partner violence exist in the literature, including the 2010 US National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), which defines emotional intimate partner violence as expressive forms of aggression and coercive control (Black et al 2011,).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this long-term violence is a situation which affects the emotional and mental equilibrium of women and their general activity, as battering is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women of all reproductive ages, especially among younger women, and during pregnancy (Gunter 2007). Intimate partner violence has negative health consequences for survivors, even after the abuse has ended and can cause poor health status, poor quality of life, and high use of health services (Campbell 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%