2019
DOI: 10.1177/0886260519836783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimate Partner Violence and Psychological Maladjustment: Examining the Role of Institutional Betrayal Among Survivors

Abstract: Research has found that a majority of individuals, irrespective of gender, experienced their first intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization between the ages of 18 and 24 years. Indeed, researchers have found that college students' experiences of IPV are comparable if not higher than that of the general population. IPV victimization also places individuals at a higher risk for developing psychological conditions. In addition, when IPV experiences occur on college campuses, there are a variety of institutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the former, results demonstrate that two key tenets of procedural unfairness—unfair treatment and unfair decision-making by an authority within the institution—shape IPV survivors’ mental health in the context of family court as has been shown in other contexts. As for the latter, these results add to prior research demonstrating a link between institutional betrayal and worsened mental health for IPV survivors (Lee et al, 2021) by highlighting the role of one specific dimension of institutional betrayal—judicial inaction. This is all too commonly reported by family court-involved mothers who have been victimized by coercive and controlling partners (Gutowski & Goodman, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Regarding the former, results demonstrate that two key tenets of procedural unfairness—unfair treatment and unfair decision-making by an authority within the institution—shape IPV survivors’ mental health in the context of family court as has been shown in other contexts. As for the latter, these results add to prior research demonstrating a link between institutional betrayal and worsened mental health for IPV survivors (Lee et al, 2021) by highlighting the role of one specific dimension of institutional betrayal—judicial inaction. This is all too commonly reported by family court-involved mothers who have been victimized by coercive and controlling partners (Gutowski & Goodman, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It may be that MST survivors who experience IB have a greater need for health care that, in some cases, supersedes prior institutional experiences that could otherwise deter help-seeking from VHA. Indeed, IB has been associated with PTSD and depressive symptoms in MST survivors (Andresen et al, 2019; Monteith et al, 2016); and dissociative symptoms, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, and physical health problems in other samples (Lee et al, 2019; Smith & Freyd, 2013; Smith & Freyd, 2017). Since we did not include health status, a potential proxy of need for health care, as a covariate, this is an important undertaking for subsequent research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key finding was that police believed that many women were unwilling to help themselves by changing their online behaviors. A study on institutional betrayal and domestic violence found that women’s perceptions of betrayal by institutions after reporting domestic violence had detrimental mental health consequences, including depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety (Lee et al, 2019).…”
Section: Institutional Betrayal and Griefmentioning
confidence: 99%