2009
DOI: 10.1080/10926770802675668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimate Partner Violence Against Women with Disabilities: Implications for Disability Service System Case Management Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Podoconiosis typically affects impoverished rural populations, which are also the populations most likely to experience intimate partner violence [30]. The social impact described here was consistent with studies that demonstrated IPV to be more common among certain demographic groups, including marginalized and disempowered women, women with lower incomes, women with disabilities [31, 32], and women who live in semi-urban or rural areas [6]. The abundant body of literature on HIV highlights that disease-associated stigma and discrimination are at the root of the IPV problem among women living with HIV [8, 10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Podoconiosis typically affects impoverished rural populations, which are also the populations most likely to experience intimate partner violence [30]. The social impact described here was consistent with studies that demonstrated IPV to be more common among certain demographic groups, including marginalized and disempowered women, women with lower incomes, women with disabilities [31, 32], and women who live in semi-urban or rural areas [6]. The abundant body of literature on HIV highlights that disease-associated stigma and discrimination are at the root of the IPV problem among women living with HIV [8, 10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We calculated prevalence rates by extracting raw proportions with 95% CIs calculated with the Wilson method. 39 We calculated pooled proportions with a random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method 40 ) and stabilised the variances of the raw proportions before pooling of data. 41 We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for the risk of violence in people with disabilities compared with non-disabled controls with a random effects model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of a racially/ethnically diverse sample of disabled women compared IPV experiences of women with disabilities in comparison to women without disabilities. This study found that women with disabilities were more than one-and-ahalf times more likely to be the recipient of physical IPV and three times more likely to be the target of threats of physical IPV (Slayter, 2009). Others have estimated that more than half of women with disabilities have been the victim of IPV at some time in their lives (Milberger et al, 2002).…”
Section: Intimate Partner Violence Victims With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, agencies may also engage in outreach efforts to potential IPV victims (Glass, Rollins, & Bloom, 2009;Hines & Malley-Morrison, 2005). Agencies differ greatly in their ability to provide services to all individuals who are in need (Brabeck & Guzmán, 2009;Cramer & Plummer, 2009;Hines & Douglas, 2011;Slayter, 2009). The purpose of this article is to explore the comprehensiveness of the DV services that exist and identify gaps in service delivery to victims who vary by immigration status, English language proficiency, and disability status.…”
Section: Services Provided By Domestic Violence Agenciesmentioning
confidence: 96%