The Organisation of Knowledge in Victorian Britain 2005
DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197263266.003.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intimacy, Imagination and the Inner Dialectics of Knowledge Communities: The Synthetic Society, 1896–1908

Abstract: Knowledge communities are formed at the interstices of university and metropolitan life. They help produce some of the intangible features of social capital and are also considered as engines of change. This chapter examines the knowledge community — the Synthetic Society — in more detail. It discusses the Rules of the Synthetic Society, which consider existing Agnostic tendencies and contribute toward a working philosophy of religious belief. Their objective was to expose various views and to seek in them not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…108 More general scholarship on knowledge formation in the nineteenth century too show the centrality of networks of friendship, alliance and intimacy as crucial, latent determinants of knowledge and history. 109 The processes of consolidation of homoeopathy through public assertions of intimacy contributes to this scholarship. Further, in privileging 'intimacy' and 'familiarity' over objectivity, the homoeopaths, as practitioners of a family-oriented, informal, intimate science, avowed a special status for themselves, as indeed other sectarian groups caught up in family, caste, kinship or sacred networks, as producers of authoritative biographies.…”
Section: Biography History and A Familiar Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…108 More general scholarship on knowledge formation in the nineteenth century too show the centrality of networks of friendship, alliance and intimacy as crucial, latent determinants of knowledge and history. 109 The processes of consolidation of homoeopathy through public assertions of intimacy contributes to this scholarship. Further, in privileging 'intimacy' and 'familiarity' over objectivity, the homoeopaths, as practitioners of a family-oriented, informal, intimate science, avowed a special status for themselves, as indeed other sectarian groups caught up in family, caste, kinship or sacred networks, as producers of authoritative biographies.…”
Section: Biography History and A Familiar Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%