2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2020.102201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal schistosomiasis: Can a urine sample decide the infection?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, endoscopic imaging, and macroscopic manifestations are not specific for chronic intestinal schistosomiasis. Some authors note that using a single urine sample could be very sensitive and highly specific in the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis, using either the trace negative model of point of contact assay or conventional PCR, when compared with fecal egg detection using duplicate Kato-Katz fecal egg detection [44]. However, using a single tool restricts the management of the disease in areas of low endemicity [44].…”
Section: Intestinal Schistosomiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, endoscopic imaging, and macroscopic manifestations are not specific for chronic intestinal schistosomiasis. Some authors note that using a single urine sample could be very sensitive and highly specific in the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis, using either the trace negative model of point of contact assay or conventional PCR, when compared with fecal egg detection using duplicate Kato-Katz fecal egg detection [44]. However, using a single tool restricts the management of the disease in areas of low endemicity [44].…”
Section: Intestinal Schistosomiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors note that using a single urine sample could be very sensitive and highly specific in the diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis, using either the trace negative model of point of contact assay or conventional PCR, when compared with fecal egg detection using duplicate Kato-Katz fecal egg detection [ 44 ]. However, using a single tool restricts the management of the disease in areas of low endemicity [ 44 ]. Correct diagnosis relies on increased awareness of this disease and rigorous search for parasitic eggs in tissue, particularly in patients from endemic areas who are suspected to have inflammatory bowel disease.…”
Section: Intestinal Schistosomiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These POC-ECO quality assurance and quality control issues reinforce previous concerns with Schisto POC-CCA ® from Rapid Medical Diagnostics (POC-CCA) both in freshly-collected 4,26 and stored urine 3,5 . Moreover, results from earlier studies based on a discontinued version of POC-CCA requiring one drop of urine and one drop of buffer [16][17][18][27][28][29][30][31][32] may not be comparable with those based on the new version of POC-CCA requiring two drops of urine and no buffer 3,4,24,33-35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The PCR technique has many assets and drawbacks ( Table 3 ) to be used in specialized laboratories in non-endemic areas. Indeed, the main drawback is related to the cost of this technique and this equipment and the main advantages are the possibility to perform a single sampling [ 19 , 57 ], the robustness of the result even if the volume of urine is low and/or preanalytical conditions are not optimized that this was shown in the current study, the reliability and the ability to detect co-infections ( Fig 3 ), [ 19 ] and the possibility to detect low circulating urine DNA load ( Figs 4 and 5 ) [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%