1996
DOI: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8566593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal absorption of bile acids in the rabbit: Different transport rates in jejunum and ileum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Finally, we observed that the uptake of bile acids by human fibroblasts was more a function of bile acid polarity, i.e., number of hydroxyl groups, than of absolute hydrophobicity. These findings are supported by those of Van Dyke et al 12 and Aldini et al 47 for the nonsaturable, sodium-independent uptake of bile acids in the liver and intestine, respectively. The significance of the present studies in cultured fibroblasts lies in the correlation of the rate of bile acid uptake, i.e., diffusion, with the relative cytotoxicity in a cell which does not possess either a bile acid transporter or an efficient system for binding, and/or detoxifying these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…27 Finally, we observed that the uptake of bile acids by human fibroblasts was more a function of bile acid polarity, i.e., number of hydroxyl groups, than of absolute hydrophobicity. These findings are supported by those of Van Dyke et al 12 and Aldini et al 47 for the nonsaturable, sodium-independent uptake of bile acids in the liver and intestine, respectively. The significance of the present studies in cultured fibroblasts lies in the correlation of the rate of bile acid uptake, i.e., diffusion, with the relative cytotoxicity in a cell which does not possess either a bile acid transporter or an efficient system for binding, and/or detoxifying these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The bile acid molecule is too large to pass paracellularly through the tight junctions of the intestinal epithelium and must be absorbed by transcellular passive or active mechanisms ( 34 ). Passive absorption of protonated uncharged bile acid species, unconjugated bile acids, and a small fraction of the glycine conjugates occurs down the length of the intestine ( 35 ). However, as most of the bile acid pool is conjugated to taurine or glycine and ionized, their uptake across the apical brush border membrane requires the presence of a transporter, and active carrier-mediated absorption of bile acids is restricted to the ileum ( 36,37 ).…”
Section: Physiology and Molecular Mechanisms Of Intestinal Bile Acid mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general consensus from numerous studies is that ileal active transport is the major route for conjugated bile acid uptake, whereas the passive or facilitative absorption present along the length of the small intestine may be signifi cant for unconjugated and some glycine-conjugated bile acids ( 34,35,(40)(41)(42). Although bile acids in most vertebrates are conjugated to taurine, the bile acid pool of humans includes a signifi cant proportion of glycine conjugates ( 43,44 ).…”
Section: Intestinal Apical Brush Border Membrane Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, heterogeneity of absorptive carriers would bring about variations in absorption. Regional or segmental distribution of apical transporters-the oligopeptide transporter, PEPT1 (Fei et al, 1994), the apical bile salt transporter (Shneider et al, 1995;Aldini et al, 1996), the organic anion transporting polypeptide 3 (Walters et al, 2000), the monocarboxylic acid transporter 1 (Tamai et al, 1999;Cong et al, 2001), and the nucleoside transporter (Ngo et al, 2001)-is well recognized. Heterogeneity is further known to exist for both metabolic enzymes and efflux transporters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%