2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0038159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interwoven fluctuations during intermodal perception: Fractality in head sway supports the use of visual feedback in haptic perceptual judgments by manual wielding.

Abstract: Intermodal integration required for perceptual learning tasks is rife with individual differences. Participants vary in how they use perceptual information to one modality. One participant alone might change her own response over time. Participants vary further in their use of feedback through one modality to inform another modality. Two experiments test the general hypothesis that perceptual-motor fluctuations reveal both information use within modality and coordination among modalities. Experiment 1 focuses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work in multifractal approaches to perception -action has found that the variety of fractional exponents in head-sway fluctuations contribute to visual judgments of distance or of extent (Kelty- Stephen & Dixon, 2014). These findings have shown that length judgments of a solid object placed in view depends not just on the object's actual size and distance from the viewer but also on variety in the fractal scaling of head movements, even when the mean and standard deviation of head sway has already been included in the same statistical models.…”
Section: Nesting Of Surfaces In the Visual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work in multifractal approaches to perception -action has found that the variety of fractional exponents in head-sway fluctuations contribute to visual judgments of distance or of extent (Kelty- Stephen & Dixon, 2014). These findings have shown that length judgments of a solid object placed in view depends not just on the object's actual size and distance from the viewer but also on variety in the fractal scaling of head movements, even when the mean and standard deviation of head sway has already been included in the same statistical models.…”
Section: Nesting Of Surfaces In the Visual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest in multifractal temporal structure had specifically to do with the possibility of a connection between temporal nesting (of fluctuations in head sway) and visual nesting (of focal within peripheral vision). We expect a helpfully thorough accounting of any relationships between multifractality and accuracy to be sufficiently complex as not to fall neatly within any single demonstration (see more extended remarks on this question in Kelty-Stephen & Dixon, 2014).MULTIFRACTAL PERIPHERY…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results indicate that self-organization need not generate veridical responses. Self-organization may be an important framework in which to consider learning in general (Kelty- Stephen & Dixon, 2014;Spencer, Thomas, & McClelland, 2009;Thelen & Smith, 1994), but we should not forget that some of the most pioneering and programmatic work in applying self-organization to psychology dealt with a perceptual discrepancy, namely, the Piagetian A-not-B error in which the developing infant's mind systematically misaligns haptic coordination of infant reaching with visual information about target location, leading to a systematically non-zero discrepancy between reach and target (e.g., Clearfield, Dineva, Smith, Diedrich, & Thelen, 2009;Spencer, Dineva, & Smith, 2009;Spencer, Perone, & Buss, 2011). Individual participants' perceptual-discrepancy data in Interleaved group (black) compared to predicted perceptual discrepancy according to Model 2 (shown in Table 3; grey) for all judgments that they produced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of exploratory movements across the body [e.g., in hand, foot, head and postural center of pressure (henceforth, CoP)] all support the use of available mechanical information for generating perceptual judgments via dynamic touch [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The predictive role of fractal fluctuations appears to even extend across the body.…”
Section: Modulating the Bodywide Flow Of Mechanical Fluctuations To Imentioning
confidence: 94%