Interviews with Indian Animal Shelter Staff: Similarities and Differences in Challenges and Resiliency Factors Compared to Western Counterparts

Abstract

Animal shelters in India are at the forefront of efforts to improve free-ranging dog welfare and tackle animal overpopulation. In terms of cultural and political context, access to resources, and public health challenges, they operate in a very different environment than Western counterparts. Despite these distinctions, current sheltering literature is largely centered around countries such as the United States. The goal of this exploratory study was to examine the experiences of Indian animal shelter staff. Researchers conducted ten semi-structured interviews, in a mix of Hindi and English, with managers, veterinary nurses, and animal caretakers from three shelters. Using thematic analysis, shelter challenges as well as resiliency factors that enable staff to cope with these challenges were identified. Key challenges were inadequate funding, community conflict, and high intake numbers. Resiliency factors included flexibility, duty of care, co-worker relationships, and understanding animal needs. The results of this qualitative study revealed that the experiences of shelter staff are shaped by social, political, and cultural factors and that there is a need for further, context specific research on Indian sheltering rather than only relying on Western perspectives.

“It’s my calling”, Canadian dog rescuers’ motives and experiences for engaging in international dog rescue efforts

“…Participants linked the continuity of dog overpopulation to a lack of government involvement and a lack of financial or veterinary resources to tackle the issue with long-term results. These perspectives are also supported by previous literature where lack of government support and lack of financial or veterinary resources were major setbacks in areas facing free-roaming dog population challenges [8,51]. P9 described their perspective in detail:…”

Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation Perspectives on Rez Dogs on the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota, U.S.A.

“…In Bali, free-roaming dogs were noticeably calmer, less likely to attack or chase other animals, and less excitable or active than owned/kept dogs [ 43 ]. Further, there are clear benefits to the dogs themselves in allowing them to roam freely [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. In a study on animal sheltering in India, unrestricted movement (the capability to move freely about a neighborhood regardless of human control) was identified as the most important factor in upholding good welfare for free-roaming dogs [ 45 ].…”

“…These community care practices of feeding and sheltering are similar to those documented through research conducted in India, where “low barrier” forms of community care (i.e., feeding) are commonly practiced, with a few community members engaging in acts for long-term welfare (e.g., vaccinations, spay/neuter, shelter, etc.) [ 44 ]. These community care efforts represent a critical source of mutual aid in the community, which could reduce the burden on the already under resourced and overburdened animal control system on the Fort Berthold reservation.…”