1954
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.44.7.919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interviewing Versus Diary Keeping in Eliciting Information in a Morbidity Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous comparison of questionnaire use with home interviewing suggests that the information elicited by questionnaire is likely to be as reliable as that elicited by direct interview (14). While diary keeping shows a higher rate of symptoms than retrospective recall, this difference is least for illness interfering with daily activity or where a doctor was seen (15). Recollection of seeing a doctor seems to be as well elicited by inail a s by direct interview for at least a year afterwards (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous comparison of questionnaire use with home interviewing suggests that the information elicited by questionnaire is likely to be as reliable as that elicited by direct interview (14). While diary keeping shows a higher rate of symptoms than retrospective recall, this difference is least for illness interfering with daily activity or where a doctor was seen (15). Recollection of seeing a doctor seems to be as well elicited by inail a s by direct interview for at least a year afterwards (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such a phenomenon has been observed in morbidity surveys (6). It is therefore difficult to determine the validity of these estimates without medical records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the widespread and diverse use of diaries in health research generally [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], prior methodological studies have focused only on the diary's ability to outperform inter views in the number of illness episodes re ported for a defined time period [23,24], The reliability of these enhanced data has been largely assumed not tested, with the exception of a study by Follick et al [25]. While the study subjects in that investigation -20 pa tients with disabling, chronic low back painare different from those examined here, the results are nonetheless informative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%