2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interviewer effects on abortion reporting: a multilevel analysis of household survey responses in Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India

Abstract: ObjectivesThe analysis aimed to assess the scale of interviewer effects on abortion survey responses, to compare interviewer effects between different question wordings and between direct and indirect approaches, and to identify interviewer and interview characteristics that explain interviewer effects on abortion reporting.Setting2018 Performance Monitoring for Action nationally representative household surveys from Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria and Rajasthan, India.ParticipantsSurvey data from 20 016 interviews wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did not examine other outcomes, it is plausible that interviewer effects are present in other sensitive outcomes and those who have inconsistent reporting on sexual behaviour are likely to have inconsistent reporting on other measures [ 4 ]. Metheny and Stephenson found that previous survey experience influenced reporting of intimate partner violence in Zimbabwe [ 17 ], and others have detected interviewer effects in the reporting of abortion [ 16 , 42 ]. This bias may lead to inaccuracies in estimates of the need for interventions among the populations that have the most to gain from such programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not examine other outcomes, it is plausible that interviewer effects are present in other sensitive outcomes and those who have inconsistent reporting on sexual behaviour are likely to have inconsistent reporting on other measures [ 4 ]. Metheny and Stephenson found that previous survey experience influenced reporting of intimate partner violence in Zimbabwe [ 17 ], and others have detected interviewer effects in the reporting of abortion [ 16 , 42 ]. This bias may lead to inaccuracies in estimates of the need for interventions among the populations that have the most to gain from such programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%