Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Conversations at the 2002 ASEE Conference in Montreal prompted Karl to write an Academic Bookshelf column on educational philosophy for the July 2003 issue of the Journal of Engineering Education. The column and set of recommended books have been read or browsed by many. Five years have passed and there are many new developments in the area, including conversations on the philosophy of engineering education. The purpose of this paper is to update an annotated reading list for those interested in engaging in the conversation about philosophy of education. John Heywood and Roy McGrann, co-designers and implementers of the 2007 and 2008 special sessions "Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education?" have crafted fascinating position pieces [1,2] and in this brief readers' guide we will try to provide complementary ideas based on selected recommended readings. Specifically we attempt to address ontology and epistemology, as well as the relationship between theory and practice.
Conversations at the 2002 ASEE Conference in Montreal prompted Karl to write an Academic Bookshelf column on educational philosophy for the July 2003 issue of the Journal of Engineering Education. The column and set of recommended books have been read or browsed by many. Five years have passed and there are many new developments in the area, including conversations on the philosophy of engineering education. The purpose of this paper is to update an annotated reading list for those interested in engaging in the conversation about philosophy of education. John Heywood and Roy McGrann, co-designers and implementers of the 2007 and 2008 special sessions "Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education?" have crafted fascinating position pieces [1,2] and in this brief readers' guide we will try to provide complementary ideas based on selected recommended readings. Specifically we attempt to address ontology and epistemology, as well as the relationship between theory and practice.
1 The State of the Art: A Field in Trouble. 2 (Un)Reliable Discourse off to a Stimulating Equivocal Start: Why Wayne Booth's The Rhetoric of Fiction Falls Short and Where to Go from There: 2.1 Stammering between Narrator and Implied Author, or, Why the Author Needs to Keep Silent; 2.1.1 The Best Version, Considering; 2.1.2 Two-Mindedness; 2.1.3 Confusing the Communicators: Forms, Penalties, Lessons; 2.1.4 The Implied Author Vulnerable to Reliability Judgments?; 2.2 “Person” Overworked or Underworked? The Line between Mediators Erased and Redrawn; 2.2.1 Narrator, Reflector, Informant; 2.2.2 Author vs. Narrator, Narrator vs. Nonnarrator: Distinctions Compared and Correlated; 2.3 Do Narrators Act, Reliably or Otherwise? Narrating-I vs. Experiencing-I; 2.3.1 “Speaks or Acts”?; 2.3.2 Other Variations on the Enacted Narrator: A Brief Comparison of Oddities; 2.3.3 An Example from Proust; 2.3.4 Impossible Ontology: The Mediator Accompanied or Abandoned by the Author; 2.4 Making Bricks without Straw: How to Do Things with an Unworkable Formula? 3 The Constructivist Turn: (Un)Reliability as a Mechanism of Integration: 3.1 The Perspectival Mechanism among Other Lines of Sense-Making; 3.2 The Perspectival Mechanism vis-à-vis Its Rivals and Partners; 3.3 The Theory Reviewed from a Different Perspective: Correcting Some Misunderstandings and Misapplications; 3.3.1 The Figurative Mechanism; 3.3.2 Reasoning in Face of Unreason: (Un) Reliability as Explained Problem and Explanatory Principle; 3.3.3 Paradigms and/or Participants Misnamed, Misgrouped, Monopolized: Is the Implied Author Necessary for Reliability Judgments?; 3.3.4 (Re)Construction; 3.3.5 (Re)Constructive Modulations: Defining (Un)Reliability and Making Reliability Judgments; 3.3.6 Dangerous Liaisons. 4 Approaches to (Un)Reliability and the Wavering among Them: 4.1 (Un)Reliability in the Beholder's Eye: The Pedophile among Reliability Judges of Humbert; 4.2 The Reader Mixed-up with Other Reference Points; 4.3 Tissues of Incompatibility: A Brief Comparison; 4.4 The Interactive, Text/Reader Orientation; 4.5 Objectivism: Miniature and Large-Scale Reflexes (Expressions, Giveaways); 4.6 How the Implied Author and Author-Centeredness (Re)Enter by the Backstairs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.