2010
DOI: 10.3322/caac.20081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract: Family caregivers of cancer patients receive little preparation, information, or support to perform their caregiving role. However, their psychosocial needs must be addressed so they can maintain their own health and provide the best possible care to the patient. The purpose of this article is to analyze the types of interventions offered to family caregivers of cancer patients, and to determine the effect of these interventions on various caregiver outcomes. Meta-analysis was used to analyze data obtained fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

33
715
4
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(771 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(66 reference statements)
33
715
4
19
Order By: Relevance
“…72% of the family caregiver comes to hospital in every visit which disrupts in their daily routine and have to spend more earning on transportation and meals besides routine treatment expenses. These results are similar to Kaiser family foundation report in the USA who surveyed 930 adult caregiver which found that nearly half of the samples were had burden 68% of caregiver were unable to do their job as before, 25% of samples Northouse et al [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…72% of the family caregiver comes to hospital in every visit which disrupts in their daily routine and have to spend more earning on transportation and meals besides routine treatment expenses. These results are similar to Kaiser family foundation report in the USA who surveyed 930 adult caregiver which found that nearly half of the samples were had burden 68% of caregiver were unable to do their job as before, 25% of samples Northouse et al [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In accordance with other literature reviews and meta-analyses [41,85], the present review found that family members who used telehealth tools reported an increased perception of social support [58,60,65,67] and less negative appraisal of illness and caregiving [52,54,67], even though the overall effect sizes were small. These findings meet the "Research Recommendations for Improving the Assessment of the Prevalence and Burden of Informal Cancer Caregiving" [86], emphasizing the need to direct attention towards the most vulnerable caregivers of cancer patients, such as those socially isolated, living in rural areas, or with low socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While a number of reviews have focussed on the effectiveness of various types of carer interventions in chronic disease and cancer (e.g. [5][6][7][8][9], few have focussed on educational interventions (e.g. 10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%