Interventions towards barriers to the practice of physical activity in adolescence: A systematic review protocol

Terra, Lauryane Fonseca; Costa, Woska Pires da; Silva, Regina Márcia Ferreira; Rezende, Leonardo Mateus Teixeira de; Noll, Matias; Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Silva

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287868

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 41 publications

(60 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(e1) Duplicates: If multiple articles have been published by the same author, on the same dataset, and on the same topic, only the most comprehensive among them will be considered. Duplicates will be removed following the Bramer’s method [ 49 ], and we will conduct a manual review to confirm their exclusion [ 47 , 50 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(e3) Studies that are not fully available in the searched databases and that cannot be accessed even after attempts to contact the authors have been made [ 47 , 48 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Duplicates will be removed following the Bramer's method [49], and we will conduct a manual review to confirm their exclusion [47,50].…”

Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol

Costa,

Fernandes,

Memon

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students’ perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, this study’s aim is to describe the protocol design for conducting a systematic review. At the same time, the review aims also to identify factors influencing the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations leading researchers to engage in research projects within institutions and their respective impacts. Method and analyses Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was guided by the PICo framework (Population, phenomenon of Interest, and Context). The preparation and development of this protocol following guidelines were employed: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015 (PRESS 2015), and PRISMA-Search (PRISMA-S). Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included without any language or publication date restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies will be screened by two independent researchers. The included studies will be analyzed to identify factors, policies, and their impacts obtained analytically. Findings will be objectively categorized and synthetically represented through figures, diagrams, and graphic models. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the Downs and Black checklists. A third senior reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. Discussion We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through the dissemination of the findings of this systematic review. This may aid the development of institutional strategies and actions that can support the enhancement of SI programs and encourage greater researcher participation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(e3) Studies that are not fully available in the searched databases and that cannot be accessed even after attempts to contact the authors have been made [ 47 , 48 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%